As someone pointed out in the discussion at
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jumping_Wikipe-tan.svg#File:Jumping_Wikipe-tan.svg
(which is heading for a keep) Stephen's - in my view - quite sensible deletion
of
I've seen Japanese text books which have happy, healthy, young
male and female faces that are utilized to comment upon the text.
More like Ash from Pokemon (not the Nurse, lol!)
Why couldn't the personification of Wikipedia a pair of
happy, healthy, young people, a male and a female?
Always seen
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Susan Spencer susan.spen...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen Japanese text books which have happy, healthy, young
male and female faces that are utilized to comment upon the text.
More like Ash from Pokemon (not the Nurse, lol!)
Why couldn't the personification of
--- On Mon, 21/3/11, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Why couldn't the personification of Wikipedia a pair
of
happy, healthy, young people, a male and a female?
Always seen together, side by side?
This is a lovely idea.
Yes. I like the always seen together aspect.
I wouldn't
Hello,
my problem in Wikipedia is, that we have not many rolemodels who are
not very known outside of the Wikim/pedia world. The only one, who is
constant in media is Sue.
Sue is wonderful, but where are the other faces of Wikim/pedia? Where
are the other women, why are they hiding?
Ok, we had a
://mrchapel.wordpress.com/
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:00:15 +0100
From: julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Gendergap] Visible female faces for Wikim/pedia
Hello,
my problem in Wikipedia is, that we have not many rolemodels who are
not very known
Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal
Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:00:15 +0100
From: julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com
To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Gendergap] Visible female faces for Wikim/pedia
Hello,
my
hehe ;)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipe-tan%27s_past,_now_and_future2.png
2011/3/20, Carol Moore in DC contac...@carolmoore.net:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipe-tan
I started a debate here. Uh oh, sexual innuendo warning.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipe-tan
Might be more appropriate.
Ways of dealing with it: come up with much more appropriate and popular
symbol widely disseminated.
Come up with male and female wikipe-tans and put those up.
Try to delete all the female only ones.
On
--- On Sun, 20/3/11, carolmoor...@verizon.net carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
Come up with male and female wikipe-tans and put those up.
Thinking out loud here:
Having images that contain both a female and a male figure might actually
be useful for young men, on a subliminal level.
Having
I noticed that the article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan
just survived a second deletion attempt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan_%282nd_nomination%29
The main Wikipe-tan image obviously should be the focus of *Change*.
11 matches
Mail list logo
