On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GlassCobra/Essays/Hotties_are_always_notableis
now the link. I've removed the shortcut because shortcuts are only
supposed to be used in Wikipedia space, and this
Certainly there's a better way to critique notability in ways that aren't
sexualized?
From,
Emily
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record:
Er, at least there's males listed under the see also section. That
doesn't change my opinion of this essay, though. It's clearly sexist.
Perhaps talk to GlassCobra about this?
From,
Emily
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Stumbled across this
Meh, it's a relic of a different era on Wikipedia. Almost all of the people
who have edited are, like GlassCobra, admins or former admins. Its also in
his userspace, not the Wikipedia: namespace.
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
What concerns me is that a newbie, with a penchant of getting on the weird
sides of websites like I do, might find it.
From,
Emily
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Meh, it's a relic of a different era on Wikipedia. Almost all of the
people who have edited are,
It might turn them off from editing Wikipedia if they believe in respecting
women.
From,
Emily
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Emily Monroe emilymonro...@gmail.comwrote:
What concerns me is that a newbie, with a penchant
