Le vendredi 2 avril 2021, 02:11:24 CEST sebb a écrit :
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 22:24, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 12:21:20 CEST sebb a écrit :
> > > Are we all agreed that:
> > > - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> > > repositories renamed
> > > - re
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 22:24, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 12:21:20 CEST sebb a écrit :
> > Are we all agreed that:
> > - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> > repositories renamed
> > - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (a
Author: buildbot
Date: Thu Apr 1 22:12:24 2021
New Revision: 1888279
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1888279&view=rev
Log:
Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot
Modified:
attic/site/docs/tracking.html
Modified: attic/site/docs/tracking.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/d
Author: hboutemy
Date: Thu Apr 1 22:12:14 2021
New Revision: 1888278
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1888278&view=rev
Log:
fix Falcon retirement date
Modified:
attic/site/xdocs/tracking.xml
Modified: attic/site/xdocs/tracking.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/xdocs/tra
Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 12:21:20 CEST sebb a écrit :
> Are we all agreed that:
> - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> repositories renamed
> - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (as per
> [4])
yes, agree
>
> If so, I will raise an INFRA JIR
Le jeudi 1 avril 2021, 20:45:27 CEST Mads Toftum a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:21:20AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> > Are we all agreed that:
> > - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> > repositories renamed
> > - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:21:20AM +0100, sebb wrote:
> Are we all agreed that:
> - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> repositories renamed
> - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (as per
> [4])
>
Agreed? no.
The more I think about it, the m
Hi Sebb,
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:21 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> Are we all agreed that:
> - projects which are moved to the Attic should not have their
> repositories renamed
> - repositories should instead be made read-only and marked as such (as per
> [4])
>
> If so, I will raise an INFRA JIRA to get
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 06:58, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> looking at Falcon retirement [1], which has a Git repo:
> - current Gitbox repo is attic-falcon.git [2]
> - but GitHub (where everybody is looking at) is still falcon.git [3]
Well spotted.
> And on GitHub, a clear sign of retirement for users
