Re: Discussion - Moving Axis2/C and Axis1 to Attic

2015-07-04 Thread Deepal jayasinghe
Sound good. I am +1 on having under one PMC boundary. So, let's try to move them to archive. Will start a vote. Regarding Sandesha2, I think we have to keep that with Axis branch, because Axis2 needs those to fully function. Deepal The same as moving them to the Attic, except that you don't

Re: Discussion - Moving Axis2/C and Axis1 to Attic

2015-07-04 Thread Andreas Veithen
The same as moving them to the Attic, except that you don't cross PMC boundaries. You basically do two things: - Move the SVN trees of the projects to /axis/archive. - Add a notice to their sites saying that they are no longer active (see e.g. http://ws.apache.org/wsif/) or remove/archive their

Re: Discussion - Moving Axis2/C and Axis1 to Attic

2015-07-03 Thread Andreas Veithen
I'm in favor of _archiving_ Axis1/C++ and Axis2/C. By archiving I mean doing the same as we did with inactive projects in Apache Web Services, i.e. moving them to an archive area inside the PMC's SVN tree. I think that's much easier than moving them to the Attic PMC. Regarding the Axis(/Java) 1.x