That would only work if one assumes that the HTML generated by the
Maven site only contains relative links. I don't think that's the
case. What we really need to do is to clean up the Maven site and get
Axis2 1.6 out.
Andreas
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 16:03, Sanjiva Weerawarana
Not really wanting to jump into the middle of this :-) but it seems
to me that not mentioning Axis *1* would be bad too. Sure it hasn't
changed in a while but people do use it and not even having a link to the
src would hurt people's ability to debug stuff.
thanks
-Doug
*waves to Doug!*
+1 - a history section is absolutely the right thing. IIRC the SVN pointers
do redirect... right?
--Glen
On 10/25/2010 10:59 AM, Doug Davis wrote:
Not really wanting to jump into the middle of this :-) but it seems to
me that not mentioning Axis *1* would be bad too.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 17:33, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I'm the only person who has touched the ws site. If you want to be
annoyed, be annoyed at me.
BTW, I was wondering why that didn't generate any SVN commit
notifications. At least I didn't see any kind of
Hi Nick,
There was a revamp in all the mailing lists of the WS project which
is explained here [1]. Now we use java-u...@axis.apache.org and
java-...@axis.apache.org for the Rampart project.
Best Regards,
Nandana
[1] - http://markmail.org/thread/2pgyfdqenit6wcwq
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 21:36, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 3:21:27 pm Andreas Veithen wrote:
I think it's again a perfect example of a discussion that degenerates
because some people don't take the time to first get the facts and try
to think about what the
