Any change to improve and simplify the user experience for the
`math/lapack2` addon is welcome from my POV!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:22 AM chris burke wrote:
> On point 1, it is not necessary that addon code be compatible with
> earlier versions.
>
> You can use RELEASE in the manifest to
On point 1, it is not necessary that addon code be compatible with
earlier versions.
You can use RELEASE in the manifest to specify which releases are
supported. Use j904 or j9.4 to support only the current release, e.g.
RELEASE=: 'j9.4'
If so, the builds for earlier versions will remain
Your contributions are always welcome!
On the point 2, & means no memu applied. The trailing \0 might be absent.
Nevertheless, LAPACK are fortran routines so that C style strings are not
expected.
Therefore I _think_ that is OK.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Igor Zhuravlov wrote:
> Dear
Dear addon maintainers,
1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide addon
compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull request
to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, just a few
nice J9.4 features, plus some
