There are some bugs for win64 branch. Will investigate.
Пт, 22 июн 2018, bill lam написал(а):
> Sorry, definition of iad is missing.
>
> iad=: 15!:14@boxopen
>
> > Thanks but I already set "IFJA=: 1" and loaded the imagekit but am now
> > getting this value error:
> >
> >viewmat 1 o. +"0/~
Sorry, definition of iad is missing.
iad=: 15!:14@boxopen
> Thanks but I already set "IFJA=: 1" and loaded the imagekit but am now
> getting this value error:
>
>viewmat 1 o. +"0/~ 0.01*i:1j99
> |value error: iad
> | parm=.(2&(3!:4)1),EncoderQuality,2&(3!:4)1 4,iad qual
>
a lot of incompatible changes in gl2 and graphic since j804. Sorry for
that. But graphics and other addons within the same j release should work
together without any problems
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 8:03 PM Devon McCormick wrote:
> I'm doing this under Windows and it used to work but now I'm
I'm doing this under Windows and it used to work but now I'm stuck on
version 8.04 until I can figure out how to do this basic thing.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:54 AM, bill lam wrote:
> jandroid uses different implementation for low level graphic routines.
> Mixing Qt and Android won't work
jandroid uses different implementation for low level graphic routines.
Mixing Qt and Android won't work unless none of those low level wd commands
have been called.
viewmat itself can work without jandroid and Qt, eg it works for both
jconsole and jhs.
previous jconsole can call Qt for some
I figured as much but I don't see why being Android should prevent me from
exercising graphic capabilities.
There used to to be something like "IFQT" that I subverted in the 8.04
version to allow me to do graphics from a console session.
It looks like the two were aggregated for some reason.
On
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
> Do I have to get this from github or does pacman get this?
Core addons (which include imagekit) are sourced from github but installed
with pacman. Changes to the github repos trigger builds for pacman.
There is a new facility that
IFJA is set for jandroid, users shouldn't set or unset it by themselves.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 8:44 AM Devon McCormick wrote:
> Thanks but I already set "IFJA=: 1" and loaded the imagekit but am now
> getting this value error:
>
>viewmat 1 o. +"0/~ 0.01*i:1j99
> |value error: iad
> |
Thanks but I already set "IFJA=: 1" and loaded the imagekit but am now
getting this value error:
viewmat 1 o. +"0/~ 0.01*i:1j99
|value error: iad
| parm=.(2&(3!:4)1),EncoderQuality,2&(3!:4)1 4,iad qual
|writeimg_pplatimg_[:3]
(though for "viewmat"). Also, for "read_image" I get this:
The offending code is probably this, from addons/media/imagekit/imagekit.ijs:
NB. conditional flip of bytes
set_cflip=: 3 : 0
if. IFJA do. RGBSEQ=. RGBSEQ_j_ else. RGBSEQ=. RGBSEQ_jqtide_ end.
try.
if. RGBSEQ do. cflip=:|."1 else. cflip=:] end.
catch. smoutput IFJA{::'Requires JQT';'Requires
OK - it looks like pacman got it but now I'm suffering self-inflicted
wounds because I've hacked my own 8.04 to overcome this error which I just
got: Requires JQT.
Since I run J console under emacs, I don't have Qt loaded. I don't
remember what I did to load this even when not running under Qt
I just now tried pacman and it picked it up just fine.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:16 PM Devon McCormick wrote:
>
> Do I have to get this from github or does pacman get this?
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:09 PM, chris burke wrote:
>
> > I don't know why the imagekit 807 addon
Do I have to get this from github or does pacman get this?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:09 PM, chris burke wrote:
> I don't know why the imagekit 807 addon was not built after the move to
> github. I updated the manifest version and it has now built correctly.
> Also, it has not changed recently
I don't know why the imagekit 807 addon was not built after the move to
github. I updated the manifest version and it has now built correctly.
Also, it has not changed recently so the older version should work.
Thanks for pointing this out.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
yes. automatic. hooks can be installed on git repo servers so that scripts
will be executed on commit. A script sends requests to jsoftware server
which determine if rebuilt is needed or not.
Not entire rollback, just a fix for old version which not intended to
maintain anymore, eg
1.0.4 ok for
This is automated?
So you are saying that if an old version of an addon had a problem
that a newer version did not have, and someone releases a fix for the
old one, this effectively roll back other changes in the released
addon?
(I'm trying to understand what you have told me.)
Thanks,
--
all jal addons distribution are hosted in jsoftware download website.
commits in github will trigger a webhook to jsoftware website and build an
updated zip or tar distribution.
sometimes bug fixes specific for an old j release, so that version of addon
is newer than that of more recent j
I am visiting my sister, who has her own schedule, and in some of the
in-between times, I've got Cliff Reiter's "Fractals Visualization and
J" 4th edition, Part 2 to keep me entertained.
I've also got the j807 beta from a week or so ago installed on this
machine, and the required addons aren't
18 matches
Mail list logo
