Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Hi Marion, I think it's best if you try it yourself. If the "general" forum (i.e. mailing list) is the only one you'd need to unsubscribe from, go to http://www.jsoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/general , fill in your email at the bottom of the page in the unsubscribe section, and confirm your unsubscription with the link in the email that is sent to you by the mailman system. If you'd need to unsubscribe from other fora, do the same for the others (their addresses are listed at https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Forums). I hope this helps! Jan-Pieter On Wed, 12 Apr 2023, 09:54 jcor...@iafrica.com, wrote: > Dear Bill/ Raul > > Hope you are well. Please could you remove my email address from this > group? I am not part of the group, Thanks much appreciated. > > marion for jcor...@iafrica.com > > - Original Message - > From: "bill lam" > To: "general" > Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2023 4:03:10 PM > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions > > It was I who uploaded them to jsoftware, but I forgot the details. > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:05 PM Raul Miller wrote: > > > Hmm... > > > > https://netlib.org/lapack/index.html points me at > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/ which leads me to > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/index.html#libraries > > > > Specifically, for 64 bit, the links > > > > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/liblapack.dll > > and > > > > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/libblas.dll > > > > And, after downloading liblapack.dll, I see: > > > > $ strings liblapack.dll | grep ilaver > > ilaver_ > > ilaver.f > > ilaver_ > > > > So I'm not quite sure what's gone wrong here, with the prebuilt lapack. > > > > Where did J's liblapack3.dll come from? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:29 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > > > Use the official lapack 3.x from netlib.org, all others are dead ends. > > > > > > Please also build an optimized blas if possible. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:22 PM Raul Miller > > wrote: > > > > > > > Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: > > > > > > > > *) lapack > > > > > > > > *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by > > > > https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ > > > > > > > > *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 > > > > > > > > *) lapack90 (404) > > > > > > > > *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably > better > > > > to use lapack) > > > > > > > > *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from > > > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ > > > > > > > > I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from > > > > J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of > > > > these repositories have we been using? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Raul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hmm > > > > > > > > > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native > > open > > > > > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > > > > > > > > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > > > > > > > > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Raul > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net > > are > > > > > > outdated. > > > > > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an > > updated > > > > > > binary. > > > > > > > > > &
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Dear Bill/ Raul Hope you are well. Please could you remove my email address from this group? I am not part of the group, Thanks much appreciated. marion for jcor...@iafrica.com - Original Message - From: "bill lam" To: "general" Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2023 4:03:10 PM Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions It was I who uploaded them to jsoftware, but I forgot the details. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:05 PM Raul Miller wrote: > Hmm... > > https://netlib.org/lapack/index.html points me at > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/ which leads me to > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/index.html#libraries > > Specifically, for 64 bit, the links > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/liblapack.dll > and > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/libblas.dll > > And, after downloading liblapack.dll, I see: > > $ strings liblapack.dll | grep ilaver > ilaver_ > ilaver.f > ilaver_ > > So I'm not quite sure what's gone wrong here, with the prebuilt lapack. > > Where did J's liblapack3.dll come from? > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:29 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > Use the official lapack 3.x from netlib.org, all others are dead ends. > > > > Please also build an optimized blas if possible. > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:22 PM Raul Miller > wrote: > > > > > Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: > > > > > > *) lapack > > > > > > *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by > > > https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ > > > > > > *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 > > > > > > *) lapack90 (404) > > > > > > *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably better > > > to use lapack) > > > > > > *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from > > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ > > > > > > I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from > > > J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of > > > these repositories have we been using? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Raul > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmm > > > > > > > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native > open > > > > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > > > > > > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > > > > > > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Raul > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net > are > > > > > outdated. > > > > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an > updated > > > > > binary. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock > > > wrote: > > > > > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version > > > doesn't > > > > > > work > > > > > > > on Windows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) > > > downloaded > > > > > > from > > > > > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > > > > > > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > For information about J forums see > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
It was I who uploaded them to jsoftware, but I forgot the details. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:05 PM Raul Miller wrote: > Hmm... > > https://netlib.org/lapack/index.html points me at > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/ which leads me to > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/index.html#libraries > > Specifically, for 64 bit, the links > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/liblapack.dll > and > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/libblas.dll > > And, after downloading liblapack.dll, I see: > > $ strings liblapack.dll | grep ilaver > ilaver_ > ilaver.f > ilaver_ > > So I'm not quite sure what's gone wrong here, with the prebuilt lapack. > > Where did J's liblapack3.dll come from? > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:29 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > Use the official lapack 3.x from netlib.org, all others are dead ends. > > > > Please also build an optimized blas if possible. > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:22 PM Raul Miller > wrote: > > > > > Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: > > > > > > *) lapack > > > > > > *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by > > > https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ > > > > > > *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 > > > > > > *) lapack90 (404) > > > > > > *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably better > > > to use lapack) > > > > > > *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from > > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ > > > > > > I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from > > > J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of > > > these repositories have we been using? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Raul > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmm > > > > > > > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native > open > > > > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > > > > > > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > > > > > > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Raul > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net > are > > > > > outdated. > > > > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an > updated > > > > > binary. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock > > > wrote: > > > > > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version > > > doesn't > > > > > > work > > > > > > > on Windows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) > > > downloaded > > > > > > from > > > > > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > > > > > > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > For information about J forums see > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Hmm... https://netlib.org/lapack/index.html points me at https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/ which leads me to https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/lapack/index.html#libraries Specifically, for 64 bit, the links https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/liblapack.dll and https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/libraries/VisualStudio/3.7.0/Dynamic-MINGW/Win64/libblas.dll And, after downloading liblapack.dll, I see: $ strings liblapack.dll | grep ilaver ilaver_ ilaver.f ilaver_ So I'm not quite sure what's gone wrong here, with the prebuilt lapack. Where did J's liblapack3.dll come from? Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:29 AM bill lam wrote: > > Use the official lapack 3.x from netlib.org, all others are dead ends. > > Please also build an optimized blas if possible. > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:22 PM Raul Miller wrote: > > > Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: > > > > *) lapack > > > > *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by > > https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ > > > > *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 > > > > *) lapack90 (404) > > > > *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably better > > to use lapack) > > > > *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from > > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ > > > > I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from > > J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of > > these repositories have we been using? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller wrote: > > > > > > Hmm > > > > > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native open > > > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > > > > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > > > > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Raul > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net are > > > > outdated. > > > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an updated > > > > binary. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock > > wrote: > > > > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version > > doesn't > > > > > work > > > > > > on Windows: > > > > > > > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > > > > | > > > > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) > > downloaded > > > > > from > > > > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > > > > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > For information about J forums see > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Use the official lapack 3.x from netlib.org, all others are dead ends. Please also build an optimized blas if possible. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:22 PM Raul Miller wrote: > Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: > > *) lapack > > *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by > https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ > > *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 > > *) lapack90 (404) > > *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably better > to use lapack) > > *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from > https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ > > I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from > J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of > these repositories have we been using? > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller wrote: > > > > Hmm > > > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native open > > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net are > > > outdated. > > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an updated > > > binary. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock > wrote: > > > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version > doesn't > > > > work > > > > > on Windows: > > > > > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > > > | > > > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) > downloaded > > > > from > > > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > > -- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Huh... looking at https://netlib.org/liblist.html I see: *) lapack *) lapack++ from https://math.nist.gov/lapack++/ superseded by https://math.nist.gov/tnt/ *) lapack3e upgraded to support features of fortran77 and fortran90 *) lapack90 (404) *) clapack (lapack after being preprocessed by f2c -- probably better to use lapack) *) scalapack recently maintained, windows dlls available from https://icl.utk.edu/lapack-for-windows/scalapack/ I guess before I dive into this, I should understand the changes from J's original lapack distribution and lapack2 distribution. Which of these repositories have we been using? Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM Raul Miller wrote: > > Hmm > > https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native open > source fortran compiler is available for windows. > > But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows > > I'll see if I can get that to work. > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net are > > outdated. > > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an updated > > binary. > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock wrote: > > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version doesn't > > > work > > > > on Windows: > > > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > > | > > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) downloaded > > > from > > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > -- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Hmm https://www.fi.muni.cz/~xsvobod2/misc/lapack/ says that no native open source fortran compiler is available for windows. But that's an old page, which might be why it ignores https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinariesWindows I'll see if I can get that to work. Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:28 AM bill lam wrote: > > Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net are > outdated. > It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an updated > binary. > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock wrote: > > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version doesn't > > work > > > on Windows: > > > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > > | > > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) downloaded > > from > > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > > > This library should be rebuilt. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Igor > > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Unfortunately the pre-built windows lapack binaries over the net are outdated. It is easier to modify the jwiki documentation than to find an updated binary. On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 8:30 AM Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock wrote: > > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version doesn't > work > > on Windows: > > > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > > | > > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) > > It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) downloaded > from > jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. > > This library should be rebuilt. > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 02:30 PM Ric Sherlock wrote: > However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version doesn't work > on Windows: > > ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) > > |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 > | > | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) It turned out that liblapack.dll (file size: 5181440 bytes) downloaded from jsoftware.com doesn't contain ilaenv_ subroutine. This library should be rebuilt. -- Regards, Igor -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
I was working through instructions on the LAPACK addon page on the wiki. Works fine on Linux, and mostly on Windows. However the new section about how to identify a LAPACK version doesn't work on Windows: ilaver_jlapack2_ (,0);(,0);(,0) |domain error in cd, executing dyad 15!:0 | ilaver_jlapack2_(,0);(,0);(,0) Any ideas on how best to address this? Simplest would be to document that issue on the wiki, but if it's fixable that would be even better!! On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:28 AM Ric Sherlock wrote: > Any change to improve and simplify the user experience for the > `math/lapack2` addon is welcome from my POV! > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:22 AM chris burke wrote: > >> On point 1, it is not necessary that addon code be compatible with >> earlier versions. >> >> You can use RELEASE in the manifest to specify which releases are >> supported. Use j904 or j9.4 to support only the current release, e.g. >> >>RELEASE=: 'j9.4' >> >> If so, the builds for earlier versions will remain unchanged. >> >> See also code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Addons/Developers_Guide#Release >> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:25 AM bill lam wrote: >> > >> > Your contributions are always welcome! >> > >> > On the point 2, & means no memu applied. The trailing \0 might be >> absent. >> > Nevertheless, LAPACK are fortran routines so that C style strings are >> not >> > expected. >> > Therefore I _think_ that is OK. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Igor Zhuravlov >> wrote: >> > >> > > Dear addon maintainers, >> > > >> > > 1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide >> > > addon >> > > compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull >> > > request >> > > to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, >> just a >> > > few >> > > nice J9.4 features, plus some refactoring and bug fixes. >> > > >> > > 2. LAPACK specs distinguish "in" (i.e. read-only) parameters type. >> Those >> > > are >> > > eligible candidates to be marked with & instead of * in parameters >> list of >> > > addon interface verbs, to avoid copying. Are there any objections for >> this >> > > massive change? >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Regards, >> > > Igor >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > For information about J forums see >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > >> > -- >> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> -- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Any change to improve and simplify the user experience for the `math/lapack2` addon is welcome from my POV! On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 3:22 AM chris burke wrote: > On point 1, it is not necessary that addon code be compatible with > earlier versions. > > You can use RELEASE in the manifest to specify which releases are > supported. Use j904 or j9.4 to support only the current release, e.g. > >RELEASE=: 'j9.4' > > If so, the builds for earlier versions will remain unchanged. > > See also code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Addons/Developers_Guide#Release > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:25 AM bill lam wrote: > > > > Your contributions are always welcome! > > > > On the point 2, & means no memu applied. The trailing \0 might be absent. > > Nevertheless, LAPACK are fortran routines so that C style strings are not > > expected. > > Therefore I _think_ that is OK. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Igor Zhuravlov > wrote: > > > > > Dear addon maintainers, > > > > > > 1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide > > > addon > > > compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull > > > request > > > to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, > just a > > > few > > > nice J9.4 features, plus some refactoring and bug fixes. > > > > > > 2. LAPACK specs distinguish "in" (i.e. read-only) parameters type. > Those > > > are > > > eligible candidates to be marked with & instead of * in parameters > list of > > > addon interface verbs, to avoid copying. Are there any objections for > this > > > massive change? > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > -- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
On point 1, it is not necessary that addon code be compatible with earlier versions. You can use RELEASE in the manifest to specify which releases are supported. Use j904 or j9.4 to support only the current release, e.g. RELEASE=: 'j9.4' If so, the builds for earlier versions will remain unchanged. See also code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Addons/Developers_Guide#Release On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 1:25 AM bill lam wrote: > > Your contributions are always welcome! > > On the point 2, & means no memu applied. The trailing \0 might be absent. > Nevertheless, LAPACK are fortran routines so that C style strings are not > expected. > Therefore I _think_ that is OK. > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > > > Dear addon maintainers, > > > > 1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide > > addon > > compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull > > request > > to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, just a > > few > > nice J9.4 features, plus some refactoring and bug fixes. > > > > 2. LAPACK specs distinguish "in" (i.e. read-only) parameters type. Those > > are > > eligible candidates to be marked with & instead of * in parameters list of > > addon interface verbs, to avoid copying. Are there any objections for this > > massive change? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Igor > > > > > > -- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Re: [Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Your contributions are always welcome! On the point 2, & means no memu applied. The trailing \0 might be absent. Nevertheless, LAPACK are fortran routines so that C style strings are not expected. Therefore I _think_ that is OK. On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 3:55 PM Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > Dear addon maintainers, > > 1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide > addon > compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull > request > to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, just a > few > nice J9.4 features, plus some refactoring and bug fixes. > > 2. LAPACK specs distinguish "in" (i.e. read-only) parameters type. Those > are > eligible candidates to be marked with & instead of * in parameters list of > addon interface verbs, to avoid copying. Are there any objections for this > massive change? > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > > -- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
[Jgeneral] math/lapack2 addon questions
Dear addon maintainers, 1. Addon code looks outdated a bit. Is it done intentional to provide addon compatibility with older JE versions? If not, I'd like to prepare pull request to update code. No hardcore with multitasking and modifier trains, just a few nice J9.4 features, plus some refactoring and bug fixes. 2. LAPACK specs distinguish "in" (i.e. read-only) parameters type. Those are eligible candidates to be marked with & instead of * in parameters list of addon interface verbs, to avoid copying. Are there any objections for this massive change? -- Regards, Igor -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
