Leo Simons wrote:
I will assert that the most serious concern with gump is that it is too
hard to use, understand or improve for non-gump-gurus. If this were a
componay and I were the boss, the first thing I would tell people to
work on is a much more readable and enticing website. Ie What is
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have just checked. Dom4j is dependent on jaxmeapi.jar. Most
probably it depends only on the Java 5 XML classes like
XMLConstants, QName, or NamespaceContext. We have long ago
suggested, that these be moved to a separate jar file
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant-contrib comes and goes (I think) as it's gump descriptor fails
to get read from SF.net's viewcvs.
If it is of any help, go ahead and move the descriptors to Gump's CVS
(I'm with a customer and without my ssh keys right now). I'm
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 2 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module werkz success, but with warnings.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project invicta (in Module invicta) failed
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
xml-commons?
Sorry, of course I meant xml-commons or jakarta-commons.
Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I'll give it a shot, thanks.
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gump code and data [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: The magically disappearing ant-contrib (Gump Project)
shouldn't you need to use:
I would suggest we just add the package, then. jaxme is holding up 134
projects, let's not add anymore potentially shaky dependencies for now.
May I ask a silly question: How come the number 134? I can hardly
imagine, that more than two or three of them are actually using JaxMe
right now?
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant-contrib comes and goes (I think) as it's gump descriptor fails
to get read from SF.net's viewcvs.
If it is of any help, go ahead and move the descriptors to Gump's CVS
(I'm with a customer and without my ssh
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
No beaver.Make. Do we have a Beaver version issue?
Seems so. JaxMe is currently using 0.9.2. We can upgrade the JaxMe
version (probably tomorrow) or downgrade the gump version. Which way to go?
Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1
I've seen this before, but can't quite imagine why a None workspace
(that
ought have been loaded from metadata/workspace.xml) would have been
returned. Could you run with --debug and see if anything helpful is
displayed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gump]$ python gump.py -w metadata/workspace.xml
If it is of any help, go ahead and move the descriptors to Gump's CVS
(I'm with a customer and without my ssh keys right now). I'm the one
maintaining the ant-contrib descriptors (ant-contrib and cpptasks)
anyway.
So, should we go ahead and move all the descriptors in our hands?
I've
No beaver.Make. Do we have a Beaver version issue?
Seems so. JaxMe is currently using 0.9.2. We can upgrade the JaxMe
version (probably tomorrow) or downgrade the gump version. Which way to
go?
It is more Gump-like to move forward, but it is your choice.
Tell you what, if you point me to a
I've seen this before, but can't quite imagine why a None workspace
(that
ought have been loaded from metadata/workspace.xml) would have been
returned. Could you run with --debug and see if anything helpful is
displayed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gump]$ python gump.py -w metadata/workspace.xml
Looking at:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/excalibur/excalibur-logger/gump_work/build_excalibur_excalibur-logger.html
I see Maven thinks these are unsatisfied:
The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied
dependencies:
avalon-framework-4.1.5.jar
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2004 16:58
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: [vote] move the descriptors in our hands
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant-contrib
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
It is more Gump-like to move forward, but it is your choice.
Tell you what, if you point me to a 0.9.2 I can install that for today.
Ok, have upgraded to 0.9.3.4.
Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 4 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jrefactory-pretty (in Module jrefactory) failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project eyebrowse (in Module eyebrowse) failed
[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25387.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Redoing this (with the latest SVN trunk) ought tell you if there is an XML
error (file/line/char, I believe).
Silly me! You are right! Indeed, the workspace.xml file hasn't been well
formed. Now for the next: I can now invoke gump. However, it indicates
that one of the
-Original Message-
From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 October 2004 22:58
To: Apache Gump
Subject: Avalon artifactIds (was Re: Excalibur Gump/Maven)
Ok, we are now down to this:
BTW: Anybody else to tell me what avalon-framework in Maven land is
ins
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 4 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jrefactory (in module jrefactory) failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jgen (in module jgen) failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project
22 matches
Mail list logo
