directory and gump

2004-12-09 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I've regenerated the eve gump descriptor using a development version of the Maven Gump plugin. I'll do the others now. I reread the documentation and did the following: - stopped mapping ids (the ability is there for the project to do that in its descriptor) - removed work and mkdir (these se

Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread sebb
Is this what you mean? == Gump Tracking Only === Produced by Gump version 2.2. Gump Run 2409122004, brutus:brutus-public:2409122004 Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #52. S. On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:22:24 -0700, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Hmm, ok -- the merge of trunk into live doesn't seem to be working: I followed the standard procedure (that Leo first helped me out with): http://wiki.apache.org/gump/GumpBranches ... minotaur > svn info Path: . URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/trunk Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb

Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Could I see the "Gump footer" (at bottom of the e-mail)? If I did correctly comment out success e-mails (and I would like to believe that even I can do that) then I need to determine why it might not be in some branch (likely LIVE). regards Adam - Original Message - From: "sebb" <[EMAIL

BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-12-09 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lenya (in module lenya) failed *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project

Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread sebb
Gump sent a success message for Jmeter-dev earlier today: [...] Received: from Unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:39:08 -0800 Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:35:39 PST From: Gump-build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

Re: PyUnit (was Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!_

2004-12-09 Thread Leo Simons
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: We need more unit tests, to weed out whatever is going on with state. Since we seem game to install Python packages now, mind if I look at moving us to this (and off our proprietary version?): http://pyunit.sourceforge.net/ I actually started work on that. PyUnit has been

PyUnit (was Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!_

2004-12-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
We need more unit tests, to weed out whatever is going on with state. Since we seem game to install Python packages now, mind if I look at moving us to this (and off our proprietary version?): http://pyunit.sourceforge.net/ regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Stefano Mazzocchi"

Re: stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Sorry, who was spammed and when/with what? [I recently had to unsubscribe from the myriad of mailing lists I was on due to mental bandwidth reasons.] Please send on a sample. If a "success" message then we have a rogue branch running somewhere ('cos I fixed HEAD and LIVE). If a "warning" message,

Re: [RT] Gump 3.0 - Database Model

2004-12-09 Thread Wade . Stebbings
This is cool. FWIW, here's some bits from my experience, implemeting something similar in a MySQL database. In my Build Results system, I have a schema that also includes a few additional things: - abritrary groupings of projects, which helps in organizaing various forms of the presentatio

Re: [kaffe][status] jakarta-regexp & junit

2004-12-09 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Stefan, Steve, Can one of you *PLEASE* fix this before Kaffe's run at 9:00 PM EST today? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32609 thanks, dims On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:34:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once we get these fixed by kaffe team, we will hit the n

Re: [RT] Gump 3.0 - Database Model

2004-12-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Since I received no pushback on my proposal, let's move on discussing the database model. I see this model is good enough for certain aspects of the proposed 3.0, but not for all. We can't store the metadata in it, in order to perform builds from, there is clearly insufficie

stinking *no longer* email still flooding lists!

2004-12-09 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I'm about ready to pull the plug on gump sending email until we figure out how to stop spamming people! -- Stefano. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RT] Gump 3.0 - Database Model

2004-12-09 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Since I received no pushback on my proposal, let's move on discussing > the database model. I see this model is good enough for certain aspects of the proposed 3.0, but not for all. We can't store the metadata in it, in order to perform builds from, there is clearly insufficient information. Th

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-12-09 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 12 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module castor success, but with warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Module eyebrowse success, but with warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project