Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

Strike that. It now requires some projects built with m2, ehich either means more packages, generating ant scripts (will probably work for all but one in question) or getting m2 to work with Gump, which I think is something best left for Gump3. I certainly don't have the bandwidth to do any work on

Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

I will update it. Half of those aren't needed any more. I'll need a packaged dom4j-1.4 - can someone sort that out? We can't upgrade to 1.5+. - Brett On 6/3/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Correct. It might be tim

Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct. It might be time to try again with building Maven from > source too... I think we never stopped trying we just never seem to get there because one of its

Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

On 6/3/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, these were preinstalled in the local repository on brutus as > > the 1.0.2 release required them. > > The "gump" user local one, yes? Correct. It might be time to try aga

Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, these were preinstalled in the local repository on brutus as > the 1.0.2 release required them. The "gump" user local one, yes? > Running "maven site" once online will pick up most that will ever be > needed. working on it. Tha

Re: Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

Yes, these were preinstalled in the local repository on brutus as the 1.0.2 release required them. Running "maven site" once online will pick up most that will ever be needed. - Brett On 6/3/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > looking at the current Gump run I see all Mav

Maven on vmgump - did I blame Jaxen too soon?

Hi all, looking at the current Gump run I see all Maven builds fail because they are lacking the very same set of dependencies. dom4j-1.4-dev-8.jar commons-jelly-20030902.160215.jar commons-jelly-tags-jsl-20030211.143151.jar commons-jelly-tags-log-20030211.142821.jar commons-jelly-tags-velocity-2

Re: public Gump seems to use gij

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03-06-2005 09:10, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> and "which java" comes up empty for my user account on vmgump. > > Its in /opt like it was on brutus. Err, yes, sure. I was looking for the "offender" which was sup

Re: public Gump seems to use gij

On 03-06-2005 09:10, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and "which java" comes up empty for my user account on vmgump. Its in /opt like it was on brutus. > Seems as if somebody else has already removed /usr/bin/java Maybe I did that. - LSD -

public Gump seems to use gij

and "which java" comes up empty for my user account on vmgump. Seems as if somebody else has already removed /usr/bin/java Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]