There is a problem with run 'vmgump-public' (12072005_04), location :
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public
The log ought be at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/gump_log.txt
There is a problem with run 'vmgump-public' (12072005_04), location :
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public
The log ought be at:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/gump_log.txt
Hi all,
Henri was kind enough to take care of the svn migration, metadata now
live in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/. If anybody
encounters a problem with accessing this, please yell. It is supposed
to provide write access for all Apache committers.
I've already modified live
Leo,
does the same happen in Gump 2? So far I haven't seen a trace of
stalled processes.
You said you had some smallish testcase, can we get access to that?
It looks as if I was too busy to spend considerable time on it right
now, so I'll try to get ant-dev involved. Besides there are a few
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confirmed that a lowly committer like myself can commit to the
metadata dir, and not be able to commit to trunk.
Many thanks to a lowly committer.
Unfortunately the from address of the commit mails is wrong, I've
reopened the JIRA
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
does the same happen in Gump 2? So far I haven't seen a trace of
stalled processes.
No. Gump2 does not set the process group id. Gump3 calls setpgrp (man
setpgrp :-)). Note there isn't a whole lot of software out there that
make setpgrp calls...
You said you had some
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I wonder how long a 'gump world' of debian would take to run (and
whether or not you can reach a 100% ;-)
I have no doubt its totally impossible. Just think of all the different
bdb versions you need to have lying around, or the mess that surrounds
all the different
No. Gump2 does not set the process group id. Gump3 calls setpgrp (man
setpgrp :-)). Note there isn't a whole lot of software out there that
make setpgrp calls...
Yes Leo, it does. Recall I implemented a scheme right before you got input
on how to do it (we even discussed if my approach would
Hi all,
While building C/C++ projects using make within gump, is there an option
to add parameters to the make command?
We would like to add the -j flag to do parallel builds on a large machine,
but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to do this.
Regards,
Graham
--
Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Graham!
While building C/C++ projects using make within gump, is there an option
to add parameters to the make command?
I don't think so (if there was it'd be an arg/ like for script/
elements). You *can* use a script/ to invoke make though in a custom
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
No. Gump2 does not set the process group id. Gump3 calls setpgrp (man
setpgrp :-)). Note there isn't a whole lot of software out there that
make setpgrp calls...
Yes Leo, it does.
NooOOOhOOooohhoh! :-)
WTF. Crap. So now I really have no clue where the problem is. We may
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
Henri was kind enough to take care of the svn migration, metadata now
live in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/. If anybody
encounters a problem with accessing this, please yell. It is supposed
to provide write access for all Apache committers.
Leo Simons wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I wonder how long a 'gump world' of debian would take to run (and
whether or not you can reach a 100% ;-)
I have no doubt its totally impossible. Just think of all the different
bdb versions you need to have lying around, or the mess that
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While building C/C++ projects using make within gump, is there an
option to add parameters to the make command?
We would like to add the -j flag to do parallel builds on a large
machine, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious way
Leo Simons wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
No. Gump2 does not set the process group id. Gump3 calls setpgrp (man
setpgrp :-)). Note there isn't a whole lot of software out there that
make setpgrp calls...
Yes Leo, it does.
NooOOOhOOooohhoh! :-)
WTF. Crap. So now I really have no clue
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
do you think it's time to throw a python task force at it?
what would you suggest?
I'm sure the python community would be quite pleased to help us making
the entire apache software (especially all the java stuff) with a python
script.
I think so too [1]. I hope the
Complain if a project does not provide all the outputs it states
Key: GUMP-147
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-147
Project: Gump
Type: New Feature
Components: Python-based Gump
Clean up entire codebase and add documentation
--
Key: GUMP-148
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-148
Project: Gump
Type: Task
Components: Python-based Gump
Versions: Gump3-alpha-6
Reporter:
I let a SPAM thorugh the moderation... So, sorry!
Any we need to do about it ??
Funny, I haven't seen it on list. Maybe Stefan or I moderated it out first.
regards
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-84?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed GUMP-84:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Leo Simons
Fixed in revision 215990.
Packages defined in built modules are shown as green but they should be
blue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-36?page=all ]
Leo Simons updated GUMP-36:
---
Fix Version: Gump3-alpha-6
(was: Gump3-alpha-5)
Version: Gump3-alpha-6
(was: Gump2-2.4)
Generate source diff report on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-94?page=all ]
Leo Simons closed GUMP-94:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Leo Simons
fixed in revision 216018
testcases for gump.engine.verifier.Verifier
---
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 01:35, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I let a SPAM thorugh the moderation... So, sorry!
Any we need to do about it ??
Funny, I haven't seen it on list. Maybe Stefan or I moderated it out first.
Just got a Failure Notice from ezmlm, saying that after removing
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any we need to do about it ??
Would likely have been too late anyway. Things happen don't worty.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Stefan or I moderated it out first.
I just ignore spam and don't react to it at all.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
25 matches
Mail list logo
