On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Is the NAnt build actually failing on that machine, or was the
build log I
got from Curt Arnold taken from another machine ?
The Gump that sends out mail is on another machine (VMGump), but NAnt
is also failing on Clarus:
-Original Message-
From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 februari 2007 16:35
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: 'Gump code and data'
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Is the NAnt build actually failing on that
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
You either need a more recent version of Mono, or I could modify
NAnt to
allow it to compile on that version of Mono. I don't know if you'd
consider
using a nightly build (or any
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 februari 2007 21:54
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
You either
On Feb 16, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Looking at the code that fails on Mono, it looks like the problem is
that Mono is detected as supporting .NET 2 but is missing a framework
method expected to be there.
NAnt by default targets that CLR on which its running, and it by
default
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
However, if you try to do nant or nant test, you will get a
failure that exec doesn't support the managed attribute. It
appears that the build file for NAnt requires features that are not
in NAnt 0.85. Removing the managed=true replaces
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zaterdag 17 februari 2007 6:20
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
However, if you try to do nant or nant test, you will get a
failure
