On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which is a bug in the sync code IMHO.
Two sorts of bugs, ws-axis shows the other one.
I think we need to blow away the copy that Gump is working in, not
our checked out source
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 1 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-receivers (in module
logging-log4j-receivers) failed
*
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 1 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-receivers (in module
logging-log4j-receivers) failed
*
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is a bug in the sync code IMHO.
Two sorts of bugs, ws-axis shows the other one.
> I think we need to blow away the copy that Gump is working in, not
> our checked out source tree.
OK, I was wrong.
> vmgump and the Solaris z
