On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:08:36 +, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:33:26 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I find it hard to
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I find it hard to believe the jms spec has changed, though I
suppose this is possible.
Which version does geronimo-* implement? Maybe it is a change between
1.0.2 (the version of JMS we had before Niclas
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I find it hard to believe the jms spec has changed, though I
suppose this is possible.
Which version does geronimo-* implement? Maybe it is a change between
1.0.2 (the version of JMS we
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we identified there is a API change between 1.0.2 and 1.1, I'd
rather have cocoon update to the latest JMS API rather than having
to different packages in gump since it seems that cocoon is the only
one having that problem
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we identified there is a API change between 1.0.2 and 1.1, I'd
rather have cocoon update to the latest JMS API rather than having
to different packages in gump since it seems that cocoon is the only
one
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:33:26 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
I find it hard to believe the jms spec has changed, though I
suppose this is possible.
I was going to work on this today but I got sidetracked.
Geoff Howard wrote:
Can someone give some help figuring out what is wrong with gump for
the JMS block? The build snippet below appears to show a failure due
to classpath (unresolved symbol) but the geronimo jms spec jar is in
the classpath
