On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll get rid of it and cut a new version of the plugin.
Thanks.
Are there any still needing mapping that need be kept?
I don't know. We usually have something like tpl-project for Apache
projects, so log4j went from jakarta-log4j to
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think, personally, that Gump and Maven should start talking about
creating a more serious infrastructure and joining forces from the
POM point of view.
I think we are already doing that with Brett helping out a lot 8-)
In the
I'll get rid of it and cut a new version of the plugin.
Are there any still needing mapping that need be kept?
BTW: If you are making tweaks, would you mind moving the nag element out if
projects and up onto the module? That way if we get a CVS|SVN error folks
would be notified. If this isn't
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are having all sort of issues because maven and gump use
different naming schemes.
Now, why don't we just adopt their naming conventions and live
peacefully together from that point on?
Wholeheartedly yes when it comes to
The maven repository uses ant and I guess cocoon would be used for these.
Let me clarify some terminology, just so I understand:
In gump there are projects, where a project id is unique globally, and
there are jar ids, where jar ids are unique within project, right?
So this parallels quite
On Wednesday 13 October 2004 18:17, Brett Porter wrote:
Let me clarify some terminology, just so I understand:
In gump there are projects, where a project id is unique globally, and
there are jar ids, where jar ids are unique within project, right?
So this parallels quite nicely to Maven's
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The maven repository uses ant and I guess cocoon would be used
for these.
When Niclas generated the Fulcrum descriptors it contained things like
jakarta-ant, jakarta-turbine-torque, jakarta-log4j or jakarta-avalon
that had to be fixed
Maybe the Gump plugin needs an update, or Niclas used an old version,
dunno.
There's only been one version with the maven tag.
I've just discovered
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven-plugins/gump/src/plugin-resources/maven2gump.properties
which apparently maps ids to gump ids.
Among
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are having all sort of issues because maven and gump use
different naming schemes.
Now, why don't we just adopt their naming conventions and live
peacefully together from that point on?
Wholeheartedly yes
On Thursday 14 October 2004 00:33, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I think, personally, that Gump and Maven should start talking about
creating a more serious infrastructure and joining forces from the POM
point of view.
What do you guys think about that?
Definately... RDF, perhaps :o)
Cheers
/how we'd make such a change.
regards,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Apache Gump [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: [RT] Standardizing on Maven names
We are having all sort of issues because maven and gump use
11 matches
Mail list logo
