Re: Gump Repository (was [collections] new snapshot to ibiblio)

2004-05-14 Thread Stephen McConnell
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/repolist.txt Right now (without metadata changes for Gump, but I know they are going to be needed) we have projectName (not moduleName) = groupId, jar ID = artefactId. This works ok for many,

Re: Gump Repository (was [collections] new snapshot to ibiblio)

2004-05-14 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
"Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/repolist.txt > > > > Right now (without metadata changes for Gump, but I know they are going to > > be needed) we have projectName (not moduleName) = groupId, jar ID = > > artefactId. This works ok for many, I

Re: Gump Repository (was [collections] new snapshot to ibiblio)

2004-05-14 Thread Stephen McConnell
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Definity seeing the contents of this would help me make more informed recommendations concerning the repository structure. I can live without the MD5's at the moment Actually, I find it was configured to be not public (i.e. not under the HTTP path). I've done a find -print

Gump Repository (was [collections] new snapshot to ibiblio)

2004-05-14 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Definity seeing the contents of this would help me make more informed > recommendations concerning the repository structure. I can live without > the MD5's at the moment Actually, I find it was configured to be not public (i.e. not under the HTTP path). I've done a find -print to here: http://