On 08/11/2016 17:35, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2016-11-08, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 08/11/2016 16:33, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>> the new machine is vmgump-vm3 rather than vmgump. Do we want to keep the
>>> old name as an alias?
>
>> -0. I don't see a need but I have no objection if someone
On 2016-11-08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 16:33, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> the new machine is vmgump-vm3 rather than vmgump. Do we want to keep the
>> old name as an alias?
> -0. I don't see a need but I have no objection if someone wants that.
Same here.
> on a related issue, I can
On 08/11/2016 16:33, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi
>
> the new machine is vmgump-vm3 rather than vmgump. Do we want to keep the
> old name as an alias?
-0. I don't see a need but I have no objection if someone wants that.
on a related issue, I can confirm I have access to the new vm.
Mark
Hi
the new machine is vmgump-vm3 rather than vmgump. Do we want to keep the
old name as an alias?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
