Re: Gump Board Report Draft

2016-09-06 Thread Martin van den Bemt
"installation will ge puppetized" should probably be "installation will get puppetized" Mvgr, Martin On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > as usual, feel free to modify it as needed. I'll submit it around the > next weekend > >

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2016-09-06 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 17 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [GUMP@vmgump]: Module apache-commons failed [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-daemon-native-buildconf (in module apache-commons) failed [GUMP@vmgump]:

Re: Gump Board Report Draft

2016-09-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-09-06, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > "installation will ge puppetized" should probably be "installation > will get puppetized" right, thanks Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@gump.apache.org

Re: Gump Board Report Draft

2016-09-06 Thread Sander Temme
> On Sep 3, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > as usual, feel free to modify it as needed. I'll submit it around the > next weekend > > https://wiki.apache.org/gump/Drafts/BoardReports/20160921 +1 > Thanks > >Stefan > >

Re: Gump on Mac OS X is back -- sort of

2016-09-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 30/08/2016 19:45, Sander Temme wrote: > Dear Community, > > Having been pestered with two e-mails a day about failing Gump cron > jobs ever since I upgraded the OS on adam.apache.org to Mountain Lion > (Mac OS X 10.8), I finally found the time this week to put the Gump > installation back