Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Folks,
Could somebody take time to apply Stefan's patch? It would be awesome to see
the Cocoon branch of things start to be built by Gump (now that it finally
can).
Thanks in advance.
Sorry, we were in the middle of switching to use SVN.
Patches applied now to
Date: 2004-07-29T06:57:19
Editor: AndrewCates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wiki: Gump Wiki
Page: FrontPage
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/gump/FrontPage
tweak
Change Log:
--
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
##language:en
#pragma
ajack 2004/07/29 07:50:48
Modified:repository cocoon.xml avalon-svn.xml
profile gump.xml
Log:
Working on migrating Cocoon to SVN.
[Fixed a typo in Avalon SVN repo definition.]
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +9 -12 gump/repository/cocoon.xml
Sorry, we were in the middle of switching to use SVN.
Patches applied now to depend logging-log4j and to
enable Gump to use our new SVN trunk.
I knew that was occurring, I wasn't thinking, sorry. Thanks for working on
it, and getting this done.
Now you are using SVN with it's built in 'simple
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Sorry, we were in the middle of switching to use SVN.
Patches applied now to depend logging-log4j and to
enable Gump to use our new SVN trunk.
I knew that was occurring, I wasn't thinking, sorry. Thanks for working on
it, and getting this done.
Now you are using SVN with
ajack 2004/07/29 11:09:23
Modified:project incubator-geronimo.xml
Log:
Fixed typo in notification.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -1 gump/project/incubator-geronimo.xml
Index: incubator-geronimo.xml
ajack 2004/07/29 11:11:10
Modified:project incubator-geronimo.xml
Log:
Attempt a target of 'jar' (not default) for now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -2 gump/project/incubator-geronimo.xml
Index: incubator-geronimo.xml
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email
issues. PMC members only vote, please.
I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they
don't have a problem with it because it is already considered an
insecure box.
I would like to propose
+1 from me.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:55:09 -0700, Nick Chalko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email
issues. PMC members only vote, please.
I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they
don't
Given 3 +1s, I have given it to Adam in a lazy consensus, I will revoke
it if anyone has a problem with this.
Adam, don't screw up too much :)
Scott
On Jul 29, 2004, at 1:02 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:55:09 -0700, Nick Chalko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Scott
Scott Sanders wrote:
Doing this on general@ instead of pmc@, because of my own email issues.
PMC members only vote, please.
I know Adam is not a member, but I asked infrastructure, and they don't
have a problem with it because it is already considered an insecure box.
I would like to propose
Greetings gump-ers, from the other half of your namesake.
I sent the following to infrastructure and they suggested running it on
brutus. I wouldn't have any problem with that.
We at Forrest would like to get an ASF-wide forrestbot installation set
up.
Forrestbot is now a set of ant buildfiles.
I have no problem with this.
+1
Scott
On Jul 29, 2004, at 3:54 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
Greetings gump-ers, from the other half of your namesake.
I sent the following to infrastructure and they suggested running it
on brutus. I wouldn't have any problem with that.
We at Forrest would like to
+1
Remember we need to treat apps on brutus as untrusted and treat the
results as such.
Dave Brondsema wrote:
Greetings gump-ers, from the other half of your namesake.
I sent the following to infrastructure and they suggested running it
on brutus. I wouldn't have any problem with that.
We at
14 matches
Mail list logo
