[GUMP@brutus]: gump/gump-test failed

2004-10-02 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project gump-test has an issue affecting its community integration, and has been

RE: [GUMP@brutus]: excalibur/excalibur-instrument-spi failed

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen McConnell
All of the Excalibur projects are declared in a Gump definition which is available to all Apache committers in the gump cvs module. The file in question is: /gump/project/excalibur.xml Please note there this is a gump/maven issue that results in the generation of inconsistent property files

[rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care. Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's likely to continue since I have no idea on how to fix the thing. I spent a few hours browsing around the gump html pages. I'm sorry, they are not only uselessly

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-02 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 2 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty success [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty-plus failed *** G U M P

RE: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2004 19:26 To: Apache Gump Subject: [rant] I hate this gump This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care. Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's

Re: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Leo Simons
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Boy, this gump sucks. you're exaggerating. Be nice now. Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself about time! ducks/ and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python. ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P - LSD

Re: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Simons wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Boy, this gump sucks. you're exaggerating. Be nice now. sorry :-( apologies, you guys, but I am kinda frustrated by all this. Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself about time! ducks/ I know. :-( but dudes, be ready for something pretty wild ;-)

Re: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Scott Sanders
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python. ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work. which is probably going to be cocoon ;-) That's a HUGE hammer, I hope

Re: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Scott Sanders wrote: On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python. ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work. which is probably going to be cocoon ;-) That's a

Re: [rant] I hate this gump

2004-10-02 Thread David Crossley
Scott Sanders wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python. ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work. which is probably going to be cocoon ;-) That's a HUGE hammer,

[RT] fixing gump

2004-10-02 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
This is not a rant, but constructive criticism. 1) as I mentioned already, I think that having gump (or forrest or whatever) generate static HTML pages creates more problems than it solves. I think we should move the architecture with something like this metadata - gump - database - jenny -