To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project gump-test has an issue affecting its community integration, and has been
All of the Excalibur projects are declared in a Gump definition which is
available to all Apache committers in the gump cvs module. The file in
question is:
/gump/project/excalibur.xml
Please note there this is a gump/maven issue that results in the
generation of inconsistent property files
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's
likely to continue since I have no idea on how to fix the thing.
I spent a few hours browsing around the gump html pages. I'm sorry, they
are not only uselessly
Dear Gumpmeisters,
The following 2 notifys should have been sent
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty success
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: jetty/jetty-plus failed
*** G U M P
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 October 2004 19:26
To: Apache Gump
Subject: [rant] I hate this gump
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time! ducks/
and you can bet your ass
that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
- LSD
Leo Simons wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
sorry :-(
apologies, you guys, but I am kinda frustrated by all this.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time! ducks/
I know. :-(
but dudes, be ready for something pretty wild ;-)
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer, I hope
Scott Sanders wrote:
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a
Scott Sanders wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer,
This is not a rant, but constructive criticism.
1) as I mentioned already, I think that having gump (or forrest or
whatever) generate static HTML pages creates more problems than it
solves. I think we should move the architecture with something like this
metadata - gump - database - jenny -
11 matches
Mail list logo