Re: [human-assisted gump] log4j back incompatible change

2004-10-29 Thread Craig McClanahan
I can help out with over half of the gump failures. Commons Logging deprecated Log4JCategoryLog a long time ago, when Log4J deprecated Category in favor of Logger. C-L itself hasn't used Log4JCategoryLog for several releases, so this change will be transparent to the vast majority of Commons

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The xmlParserAPIs is from memory a rename of xml-apis from xml-commons, provided by xerces in it's download, right? Yes and no. The version shipped by Xerces is far more advanced than the latest released version (and even that has

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread David Crossley
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Dion Gillard wrote: The xmlParserAPIs is from memory a rename of xml-apis from xml-commons, provided by xerces in it's download, right? Yes and no. The version shipped by Xerces is far more advanced than the latest released version (and even that has been a

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-29 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 6 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jcharts (in module jakarta-tapestry) failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project txt2html-task (in module jakarta-servletapi-5)

BATCH: Unable to send...

2004-10-29 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 (in module jakarta-cactus) failed

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 29 Oct 2004, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: I understood that xml-commons was supposed to be the official home. So do I. When we prepared the release of Ant 1.6.0 we realized that Xerces wouldn't work with the 1.0beta2 release from xml-commons, so we were

Re: [human-assisted gump] log4j back incompatible change

2004-10-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello Stefano, We have been trying to shed the Category class for over 3 years. It has been and still is an excruciatingly difficult and long process. As long as source code does not directly refer to the Category class but uses Logger instead, it should be compatible with both existing log4j

Re: [human-assisted gump] log4j back incompatible change

2004-10-29 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hi Craig, Apparently, since you removed the Log4JCategoryLog class, commons-logging builds fine today. Do you have a copy of yesterday's errors for commons-logging? If you do, could I please have a look at them? Thanks in advance, At 07:40 AM 10/29/2004, Craig McClanahan wrote: I can help out

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2004-10-29 Thread brutus
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 3 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jtidy-cvs (in module jtidy) failed [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-security-tests (in module xml-security) failed [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread David Crossley
Stefan Bodewig wrote: David Crossley wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: I understood that xml-commons was supposed to be the official home. So do I. When we prepared the release of Ant 1.6.0 we realized that Xerces wouldn't work with the 1.0beta2 release from xml-commons, so we were

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 29 Oct 2004, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: David Crossley wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: I understood that xml-commons was supposed to be the official home. So do I. When we prepared the release of Ant 1.6.0 we realized that Xerces wouldn't work

Re: cvs commit: gump/project xml-apis.xml

2004-10-29 Thread David Crossley
Stefan Bodewig wrote: David Crossley wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: David Crossley wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: I understood that xml-commons was supposed to be the official home. So do I. When we prepared the release of Ant 1.6.0 we realized that Xerces wouldn't work