Re: [GUMP] Details on JaxMe's test failure

2005-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have disabled the failing test in the trunk. Doesn't look as if it worked, aren't we checking out the correct code? In the medium to long term, I have a more important question: Why is it, that we don't receive these nag mails?

Re: [GUMP] Details on JaxMe's test failure

2005-08-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 8/26/05, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't look as if it worked, aren't we checking out the correct code? From http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ws-jaxme/ws-jaxme/gump_work/build_ws-jaxme_ws-jaxme.html I quote the following:

Re: [GUMP] Details on JaxMe's test failure

2005-08-26 Thread sebb
On 26/08/05, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/26/05, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't look as if it worked, aren't we checking out the correct code? If it's not obvious that the correct script is being used, you could add a Revision property to each of the XML

Re: [GUMP] Details on JaxMe's test failure

2005-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At line 171 in ant/js.cml, I find the following lines: tests fileset dir=${src.js} include name=org/apache/ws/jaxme/js/junit/**/*Test.java/

BATCH: All dressed up, with nowhere to go...

2005-08-26 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters, The following 1 notifys should have been sent *** G U M P [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-feedparser (in module jakarta-commons) failed *** G U M P