Re: Apachecon

2007-04-26 Thread Sander Temme


On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:


Maybe nice opportunity to have a Gump meeting at the hackathon ?


+1

I expect to arrive at the Mövenpick mid-morning on May 1.

S.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Apachecon

2007-04-26 Thread Leo Simons

On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Sander Temme wrote:

On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:

Maybe nice opportunity to have a Gump meeting at the hackathon ?


+1


+1


I expect to arrive at the Mövenpick mid-morning on May 1.


Me too probably.

- Leo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apachecon

2007-04-26 Thread Steve Loughran

Leo Simons wrote:

On Apr 26, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Sander Temme wrote:

On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:

Maybe nice opportunity to have a Gump meeting at the hackathon ?


+1


+1


I expect to arrive at the Mövenpick mid-morning on May 1.


Me too probably.


late tuesday evening for me. 0900 talk on thursday, so no beers 
wednesday night. well, not many


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BATCH: Unable to send...

2007-04-26 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters,

The following 1 notifys should have been sent

*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12-tests (in module logging-log4j-12) 
failed
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12-tests (in module logging-log4j-12) 
failed
Failed with to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Failed to send notify e-mail: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (550, 'sorry, your envelope 
sender is in my badmailfrom list')}
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project logging-log4j-12-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 7 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- logging-log4j-12-tests :  Fast and flexible logging package for Java


Full details are available at:

http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/logging-log4j-12/logging-log4j-12-tests/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -INFO- Made directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/classes]
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/logging-log4j-12/logging-log4j-12-tests/gump_work/build_logging-log4j-12_logging-log4j-12-tests.html
Work Name: build_logging-log4j-12_logging-log4j-12-tests (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 2 mins 19 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only regression 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/dist/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/resources:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/junit3.8.1/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/dist/lib/log4j-26042007.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-oro/jakarta-oro-26042007.jar
-
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:421)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:912)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:766)
[junit] [bogus] is an unknown syslog facility. Defaulting to [USER].
[junit] -  ---
[junit] 
[junit] Testcase: testDefaultConstructor took 0.113 sec
[junit] Testcase: testTwoParamConstructor took 0.017 sec
[junit] Testcase: testTwoParamConstructorBadFacility took 0.002 sec
[junit] Testcase: testThreeParamConstructor took 0.531 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityString took 0.003 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityStringUnexpected took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityBogus took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityNull took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilitySystemNames took 0.002 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityLocalNames took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityPrinting took 0.001 sec
[junit] Testcase: testConstants took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityKern took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityNull took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityBogus took 0.001 sec

BATCH: Unable to send...

2007-04-26 Thread gump
Dear Gumpmeisters,

The following 1 notifys should have been sent

*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12-tests (in module logging-log4j-12) 
failed
*** G U M P
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-12-tests (in module logging-log4j-12) 
failed
Failed with to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Failed to send notify e-mail: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': (550, 'sorry, your envelope 
sender is in my badmailfrom list')}
To whom it may engage...

This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For 
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, 
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Project logging-log4j-12-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 projects,
 and has been outstanding for 7 runs.
The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
- logging-log4j-12-tests :  Fast and flexible logging package for Java


Full details are available at:

http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/logging-log4j-12/logging-log4j-12-tests/index.html

That said, some information snippets are provided here.

The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were 
provided:
 -INFO- Made directory 
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/classes]
 -INFO- Failed with reason build failed



The following work was performed:
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/logging-log4j-12/logging-log4j-12-tests/gump_work/build_logging-log4j-12_logging-log4j-12-tests.html
Work Name: build_logging-log4j-12_logging-log4j-12-tests (Type: Build)
Work ended in a state of : Failed
Elapsed: 2 mins 19 secs
Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true 
-Xbootclasspath/p:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-xerces2/build/xercesImpl.jar
 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/x1/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml 
-Dbuild.sysclasspath=only regression 
[Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests]
CLASSPATH: 
/opt/jdk1.5/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/dist/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/tests/resources:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-jmf.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-swing.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-apache-resolver.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/usr/local/gump/packages/junit3.8.1/junit.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/logging-log4j-12/dist/lib/log4j-26042007.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-oro/jakarta-oro-26042007.jar
-
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
[junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:421)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:912)
[junit] at 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:766)
[junit] [bogus] is an unknown syslog facility. Defaulting to [USER].
[junit] -  ---
[junit] 
[junit] Testcase: testDefaultConstructor took 0.113 sec
[junit] Testcase: testTwoParamConstructor took 0.017 sec
[junit] Testcase: testTwoParamConstructorBadFacility took 0.002 sec
[junit] Testcase: testThreeParamConstructor took 0.531 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityString took 0.003 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityStringUnexpected took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityBogus took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityNull took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilitySystemNames took 0.002 sec
[junit] Testcase: testGetFacilityLocalNames took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityPrinting took 0.001 sec
[junit] Testcase: testConstants took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityKern took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityNull took 0 sec
[junit] Testcase: testSetFacilityBogus took 0.001 sec

Re: Apachecon

2007-04-26 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Coolio :).. Probably sitting at a table together in the hacathon area will do 
the trick. Maybe
whipping something up for the Fast Feather Track as a call for help to start 
with maven2 support in
Gump :)

We probably could reuse a lot from Leo's presentation for that (although I 
don't have a clue about
the content)

Mvgr,
Martin

Martin van den Bemt wrote:
 Maybe nice opportunity to have a Gump meeting at the hackathon ?
 
 Mvgr,
 Martin
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]