On Sunday 03 October 2004 07:34, Scott Sanders wrote:
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer, I hope you're pounding some big nails :)
http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df200210/df20021030.jpg
Example:
http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon-2.1/index.html
look at what it says:
SUCCESS
success at what? at finding problems? then it says overall project
success 18%. WTF? what is the measure of success for gump, anything
higher than zero?
True, likely misleading. This is a
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's
likely to continue since I have no idea on how to fix the thing.
I spent a few hours browsing around the gump html pages. I'm sorry, they
are not only uselessly
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 October 2004 19:26
To: Apache Gump
Subject: [rant] I hate this gump
This is a rant. I rant when I'm pissed, but I rant when I care.
Cocoon received some 25 nags in a row, twice, in two days and it's
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time! ducks/
and you can bet your ass
that the webapp will *NOT* be written in python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
- LSD
Leo Simons wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Boy, this gump sucks.
you're exaggerating. Be nice now.
sorry :-(
apologies, you guys, but I am kinda frustrated by all this.
Yes, I'm going to do something about it myself
about time! ducks/
I know. :-(
but dudes, be ready for something pretty wild ;-)
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer, I hope
Scott Sanders wrote:
On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a
Scott Sanders wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
and you can bet your ass that the webapp will *NOT* be written in
python.
ooh, ooh, is it ruby? :-P
it's going to be the simplest thing (for me!) that can possibly work.
which is probably going to be cocoon ;-)
That's a HUGE hammer,
