On Thursday 21 October 2004 12:34, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
place your vote.
I don't know who is eligable for voting in Gump, but I guess it is all the ASF
committers... so here is my;
+1
--
+--//---+
/ http://www.bali.ac/
/ http://niclas.hedhman.org /
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the CVS
repository.
+1
--
David Crossley
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Scott Sanders wrote:
4) If they want to edit the metadata, any decent OS can mount the SVN
repo as a webdav drive.
Hmmm, no, I don't think we have autoversioning turned on for the ASF web
site. It would be a read-only mount if they did that.
I don't believe we are excluding anyone, now that svn
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the
CVS repository.
+0.9
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the CVS
repository.
Reasons:
1) ease of installation: today it's a pain to download and getting
gump running and most it's due to the fact that metadata and code reside
in different repositories
2) ease of use: SVN is just much
4) If they want to edit the metadata, any decent OS can mount the SVN
repo as a webdav drive.
I don't believe we are excluding anyone, now that svn is 1.0.
+1
Scott
On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:34 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I propose to move the gump metadata over to SVN and close down the CVS
