Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Maybe when I googled for an SMTP spec I found a pre-Y2K one. I've updated
the code now. Thanks for the heads up, and please let us know if this isn't
resolved after my commit.
regards
Adam
I received the first GUMP message not tagged as spam yesterday (20 oct)
at 19:08PM
Today I looked at the actual checks they trigger, and found:
4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting
Of course I can lower the score spamassassin is giving to that rule, but
I think the format for the 'Date:' header in mail messages should
include 4 digit year.
I'm receiving GUMP failure warnings as a subscriber to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've ever wondered why spamassassin was tagging
them as spam.
Today I looked at the actual checks they trigger, and found:
4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting
Of course I can lower the
