Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Repo

2003-11-25 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Then I'd call it Ruper for now, which is the name of the initially proposed codebase, where Ruper = resource updater. Or in honor of the best competitor on Survivor, ever: Rupert. Brian

Moving existing incubating project websites to the new incubator url

2003-11-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the old URL, what about moving them like this? No need to rush, it can be easily done in the next site update. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/altrmi | v http://incubator.apache.org/altrmi

Re: Moving existing incubating project websites to the new incubator url

2003-11-25 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the old URL, what about moving them like this? No need to rush, it can be easily done in the next site update. http://incubator.apache.org/projects/altrmi | v

Finalizing the new Project STATUS template

2003-11-25 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Finally I have finished the new draft for a project incubation status page that should be more workable. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NewProjectStatusTemplate Comments, suggestions, blah blah blah welcome. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba

RE: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 03:35, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a Wiki setup and JIRA. On top of all the work that Jason Dillon did, Leo Simon worked all night tonight on code changes to MoinMoin. It appears he's finished.

Re: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Leo Simons
Jason van Zyl wrote: I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a Wiki setup and JIRA. maybe that's because you're watching :D seriously...some food for thought perhaps... the wiki is the first bit of ASF infrastructure I'm getting more than passively involved in.

Re: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a Wiki setup and JIRA. maybe that's because you're watching :D seriously...some food for thought perhaps... the wiki is the first bit of ASF

Re: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 15:06, Leo Simons wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote: Jason volunteered, I volunteered, we were given access easily enough, proposals were accepted easily enough, and then it just took weeks for us to get things in shape.

Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

2003-11-25 Thread Alex Karasulu
Guys, I there are no objections I would like to forward mail from the sf.net ldapd project to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is obviously a short term thing until the community has switched over completely to the Apache infrastructure. Alex

RE: Moving existing incubating project websites to the new incubator url

2003-11-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the old URL, what about moving them Fine with me, just toss rewrite rules into httpd.conf so folks going to the old URLs don't get the dreaded 404. I was going to setup .htaccess to do

RE: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I'm just trying to draw a constrast between the way things used to be done here, how Bob and I do things at Codehaus and the atmosphere that is now here where doing anything seems to be a long drawn out, protacted flurry of tome-like essays between committees. Leo and Jason were given apsite

RE: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I'm just trying to draw a constrast between the way things used to be done here, how Bob and I do things at Codehaus and the atmosphere that is now here where doing anything seems to be a long drawn out, protacted flurry of tome-like

Re: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

2003-11-25 Thread Phil Steitz
Noel J. Bergman wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Committers could be given commit access long before having project member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but a lower bar for committing. Is this

RE: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Infrastructure isn't standing in the way of Jira. Infrastructure wants to USE Jira. So why don't we start right now. I can setup a project on the codehaus box and it can get migrated with the rest of the stuff. Ask on infrastructure, but I think that people are willing to wait. What is

RE: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

2003-11-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
At some point, hopefully not too far down the pike, the Committer is voted into the PMC. Until that happens, the Committer does not have a binding vote. Cannot have a binding vote, because to have one outside of the legal structure would expose the Committer. Can you explain exactly

RE: Generated sites

2003-11-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Migration is not built into Jira. The XML export is for backup, not migration. I hacked a migration of the database, but we ran into some problems. Jeff, who works for Atlassian, asked if he could take over the migration so that they could debug it. So we're waiting while Jeff