Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed
in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation
branding.
[snip]
Maybe folks are confused by this sentence in the 'Minimum Exit
Requirements' section.
On 6/7/05, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+Requirements
quote
Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official Release.
Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK.
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Minimum+Exit+R
equirements
Note: incubator projects are not permitted to issue an official
Release.
Test snapshots (however good the quality) and Release plans are OK.
On 07.06.2005, at 22:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Demo? Technology preview? Milestone? Happy Meal?
Look, maybe this is hard to understand, especially if people are
coming from
an enviroment focused on code quality first, but this isn't about
the state
of the code. It is about the state
I meant biological object model project. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:35 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Biological Object Model Project
All,
I would like to start a biological object model
