I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my naivete.I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at Apache. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order to use a spec jar from the JCP, you have to click a license every time you download it. And this can be a
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 31, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
[SNIP]
I don't see any point in having this conversation every year.
Whoever is willing to fix the content on incubator, please feel
free to remove the entire site (except the project status files)
and start over
On 12/28/05, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although that might be technically true, we do things collectively in the
ASF. Mind you, we've not had a process for voting on IP Clearance type
submissions, so that's been a potential loophole.
I'm not sure what a vote would accomplish.
I realize that many might have checked-out of this thread about 200
messages ago... if there's any interest or comment...
(Note, this is just an experiment)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RT] Super Simple Site Generation Tool
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:39:35 -0500
From:
+1 (in other words Make it so!)
-- dims
On 1/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that many might have checked-out of this thread about 200
messages ago... if there's any interest or comment...
(Note, this is just an experiment)
Original Message
On 12/31/2005 1:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my
naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at
Apache. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order to use a spec jar
from the JCP, you have to click a
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Craig, you hit the nail on the head with this. I am running into this
now. The impetus for my attempting to start this is that I currently
have to go on an easter egg hunt for spec jars. I have no strong
feelings how the jars get into a central place for me to
On 1/1/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/28/05, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although that might be technically true, we do things collectively in
the
ASF. Mind you, we've not had a process for voting on IP Clearance type
submissions, so that's been a potential
On 1/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that many might have checked-out of this thread about 200
messages ago... if there's any interest or comment...
+1. I like it.
And I especially like the Flooga Wagie Foo Foo news. ;-)
Happy New Year!
--
Martin Cooper
(Note,
If we are moving from the general case to the specific, then, yes, it
may be that the MyFaces PMC will decide the existing community cannot
work with the code on their own.
The MyFaces PMC might then choose to bring a proposal to the Incubator
PMC to create a podling, and see if the Incubator PMC
On Jan 1, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Craig, you hit the nail on the head with this. I am running into this now. The impetus for my attempting to start this is that I currently have to go on an easter egg hunt for spec jars. I have no strong feelings how
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
How would even having a local copy of the JARs prevent the problem that
Forrest won't actually generate the site?
I don't believe that to be correct, but we can clarify with David and Ross.
As far as I am aware the site builds fine.
There
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:41:35AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The fact that we have to rely on a human being means to me (and probably
where Mads is coming from) that the entire workflow is broken. -- justin
Exactly! Depending on a 3rd party as part of the process
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
As I understood your recent comments, you (Forrest) are actively working to
make the workflow simpler, such than anyone should be able to download a
binary, grab our site from SVN, build and publish. Correct?
Yes that is correct. As an
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jan 1, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Craig, you hit the nail on the head with this. I am running into
this now. The impetus for my attempting to start this is that I
currently have to go on an easter egg hunt for spec jars.
(Note, this is just an experiment)
+1 to make it the default. (I'll try to provide some help as time permits.)
Even with the floogy woogy stuff, it's more useful than the current site. =)
Thanks. -- justin
-
To
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 31, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Just the tabbed and menu navigation. And some other little bits that
no one
probably uses.
FTR, I hate the tabs, find the layout unreadable,... And, no, I don't
want the site to generate a friggin PDF.
I've
On 12/31/05, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at Apache.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order to use a spec jar from the JCP, you
have to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
As long as everyone has to have a tool locally to build and commit a
site in order to change *content*, people *will* find the tool annoying.
A smaller tool maybe less ...but it's *is* an additional step that
should not be required. Period!
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
Whoa! so the workflow is tied to David watching for commits?
When someone said that at apachecon, I thought it was a joke - I'm
beginning to understand more and more of why people are annoyed.
Why? The man has
Ross Gardler wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The fact that we have to rely on a human being means to me (and probably
where Mads is coming from) that the entire workflow is broken. -- justin
Exactly! Depending on a 3rd party as part of the process is what really
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see any point in having this conversation every year.
Whoever is willing to fix the content on incubator, please feel
free to remove the entire site (except the project status files)
and start over with whatever tool you deem suitable.
Leo Simons wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
My guess about the stumbling block for some people is the
need to check the final result into svn. Also the need to
copy files from build/site into site-publish and then do
svn add or svn remove files. I think that we can get
Cocoon to
Ross Gardler wrote:
I've been wanting to create a skin for Forrest that looks like that at
http://www.apache.org for some time. Mostly because the default Forrest
skins are, well old.
The recent thread here discussing Forrest as a tool has finally prompted
me into action (congrats to anyone
Patch to create docs using coat skin
Key: INCUBATOR-9
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-9
Project: Incubator
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ross Gardler
Priority: Trivial
The coat skin is a new skin for
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:45:56AM +, Ross Gardler wrote:
It is not (yet) a perfect copy of the main ASF site. We still need some
work on the finer details. However, I hope this is enough to give you a
feel.
FWIW, it doesn't render correctly on Safari. It always goes over the width
and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-9?page=all ]
Ross Gardler updated INCUBATOR-9:
-
Attachment: coat.zip
coat-skin.diff
Apply patch as normal
Unzip coat.zip into FORREST_HOME/main/webapp/skins
Patch to create docs using
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:45:56AM +, Ross Gardler wrote:
It is not (yet) a perfect copy of the main ASF site. We still need some
work on the finer details. However, I hope this is enough to give you a
feel.
FWIW, it doesn't render correctly on Safari. It
28 matches
Mail list logo
