I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
See the latest proposal text below.
Andrus
---
Cayenne Incubator Proposal
+1
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
See the latest proposal text below.
Andrus
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
Hola,
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, but I thought we agreed on the DB project as
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, but I thought we agreed on the DB project as the
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
Mhm, why is the Incubator PMC now the sponsor instead of the DB PMC ?
Tom
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, but
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB,
but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final decision
on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or DB
subproject)?
Andrus
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/2/06,
On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, but
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB,
but is this consistent
On 3/2/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
Not AFAIK. I for one would be in favor of having the DB PMC sponsor
Cayenne because it fits there
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/2/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
Not AFAIK. I for one would be in favor of having
Ted,
The community has been aware of our two graduation options. The issue
of sponsorship, albeit the important one, doesn't change the goal of
the proposal. Cris just posted a note to our committer list to inform
everybody who is not watching [EMAIL PROTECTED] of the current
Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in
agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or
Geronimo.
-Mike
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted,
The community has been aware of our two graduation options. The issue
of
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in
agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or
Geronimo.
Geronimo? Sheesh.
The issue now is incubation sponsorship, which is independent of landing
spot after graduation.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
Incubator PMC vote. As far as I can tell it is resolved now.
Everybody involved from Cayenne, Incubator, and DB are in favor of DB
PMC to be the Sponsor.
Ok, then I'll
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to
DB, but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final
decision on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or
DB subproject)?
You cannot actually do
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Geir,
I don't think there is any contradiction between your post and what
Mike was saying. If you look at the thread context, we are still
talking about how to move with the incubation sponsorship.
More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with
On 3/2/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
Incubator PMC vote. As far as I can tell it is resolved now. Everybody
involved from Cayenne, Incubator, and DB are in favor of DB PMC to be
the Sponsor.
There
Hola,
He was referring to the discussion on the db-general list.
I've started a vote on the DB PMC list which ends on Sunday, so let's
postpone this discussion until then. I'll post the results on Monday.
cheers,
Tom
Good, thank you.
Yoav
On 3/2/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola,
He was referring to the discussion on the db-general list.
I've started a vote on the DB PMC list which ends on Sunday, so let's
postpone this discussion until then. I'll post the results on Monday.
cheers,
Tom
Good, thank
21 matches
Mail list logo
