peter royal wrote:
dave, do you hold full copyright to put you in a position to make a
grant?
We probably need to check up on that one. The project was released to
Safehaus way back in Feb, and has been developed there since. However, I
developed the original source code at my place of
On 7/13/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Tam wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache
Software Foundation and is chosen by the Sponsor to actively lead in
the
+1 (non-binding)
On 13 Jul 2006, at 07:48, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Jason van Zyl
On 7/14/06, Dave Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We probably need to check up on that one. The project was released to
Safehaus way back in Feb, and has been developed there since. However, I
developed the original source code at my place of work, so I guess I may
need a clearence form or
On 7/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Tam wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache
Software Foundation and is chosen by the Sponsor to actively lead in
the
On 7/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Tam wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache
Software
On Jul 13, 2006, at 10:49 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 7:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
In the ASF we do have PMC Chairs, period.
Now let's say, someone wins this debate on wether or not having a
PMC Chair from inside or outside the project is more or less
likely to result in
Bruce Snyder wrote:
What do you mean fix the doc? Is it not the policy that mentors be
members? I've seen and been involved in discussions where this was
used as a reason that non-members could not be mentors of an
incubating project.
Mentors are (MUST BE) Incubator PMC Members. ASF Members
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could someone point to the post that would explain how it should be fixed?
To quote myself, but this is hardly the first time it has come up:
---
Mentors are (MUST BE) Incubator PMC Members. ASF Members are automatically
eligible for PMC membership; non-Members may be
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
To quote myself, but this is hardly the first time it has come up:
---
Mentors are (MUST BE) Incubator PMC Members. ASF Members are
automatically
eligible for PMC membership; non-Members may be elected at the
discretion of
the Incubator
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is absolute nonsense to have someone guiding newbies through
the ASF process when they haven't even made it to the halfway
point themselves.
Membership is a half-way point? What's the full distance? ;-)
But I agree with you: It is absolute nonsense to have someone
Would probably also be a good idea to fix the tuscany page itself..It mentions that it is in the
incubator, but the page title and header is Apache Tuscany..
Mvgr,
Martin
Mike Edwards wrote:
Dion,
You're right. It should mention Incubator.
I apologise for this oversight and I'll get it
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is absolute nonsense to have someone guiding newbies through
the ASF process when they haven't even made it to the halfway
point themselves.
Membership is a half-way point? What's the full distance? ;-)
I'll
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we
feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would
now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be found
Ted Leung wrote:
It seems like the discussion on Heraldry has died down, so I'd like to
call for a VOTE on accepting Heraldry into the incubator.
In keeping with Apache practice, I'd like to allow 72 hours or so for
the vote to close, so please vote by 11:59PST on Thursday July 13th.
The
+1
(non-bindig)
-Matthias
On 7/14/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
It seems like the discussion on Heraldry has died down, so I'd like to
call for a VOTE on accepting Heraldry into the incubator.
In keeping with Apache practice, I'd like to allow 72 hours or so for
On 7/14/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't mean people need to be an ASF member to be involved in
incubation of a project -- they simply don't meet the required need
for a Mentor who is an ASF member.
+1. -- justin
On 7/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
What do you mean fix the doc? Is it not the policy that mentors be
members? I've seen and been involved in discussions where this was
used as a reason that non-members could not be mentors of an
incubating project.
On 7/14/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn't mean people need to be an ASF member to be involved in
incubation of a project -- they simply don't meet the required need
for a Mentor who is an ASF member.
+1. --
The branding page says that a podling must be referred to as Apache
Podling-Name and I think this is consistent with that. A quick poll
of podling websites shows this to be the norm.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
Right. We tried to do the best
On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Would probably also be a good idea to fix the tuscany page
itself..It mentions that it is in the incubator, but the page title
and header is Apache Tuscany..
The branding page says that a podling must be referred to as Apache
Sorry, I can't resist...
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ASF Members are automatically
eligible for PMC membership; non-Members may be elected at the
discretion of
the Incubator PMC.
with-big-grin
This is some of that non-hierarchical, peer-based stuff you were
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:51 AM, David Blevins wrote:
I have the gut feeling there is something we can do to marry these
concerns, as my primary concern is how the incubation ends. I.e. I
think there should be an opportunity before incubation ends to
learn to function *with* that person and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Based on the following votes (nine of which were cast by PMC
members), the Heraldry proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
HeraldryIdentityProposal has been accepted for incubation under the
sponsorship of the Incubator PMC.
Ted Leung +1
Ted Leung wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:51 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Assuming we decide to start ppmcs with a chair, there's no reason you
couldn't start with one of the mentors as the chair and make it an
objective to exit with one of the incubated committers as the chair.
Given that I
You miscount. I voted +1 weeks ago.
Ted Leung wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Based on the following votes (nine of which were cast by PMC members),
the Heraldry proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal has been
accepted for incubation under
My apologies -- I only counted replies to the vote that I called for
on Tuesday. Always good to have more +1's.
Ted
On Jul 14, 2006, at 5:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You miscount. I voted +1 weeks ago.
Ted Leung wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Based on the
27 matches
Mail list logo
