Re: Including snapshot dependencies from other ASF projects

On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, svn is not an ASF project so they don't (have any reason to) follow our tar - vote - distribute rules. FWIW, correct - but - Subversion largely follows the ASF release rules (releases get at least 3 +1s before being posted).

Digest-mailing-list (un)subscribe links

Hi, I had problems unsubscribing from the incubator general digest. The ready-to-go unsubscribe link from the mail footer has a doubled -digest which ezmlm doesn't like very much. Same problem seems to apply to the subscribe link. Posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably is not a good idea either.

Re: non-existant private list

On 11/20/06, Jeremy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The incubator info file [1] has a list of the ppmc / private mailing lists. Except we don't have a ppmc list for the Woden podling and when I tried out the woden-private list qmail told me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1

robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/20/06, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since these are generated files, must they have license headers? no however, i think that running preprocessors against the source in the repository that strips license headers *is* an issue for me. IMO

Packaging for distribution - replacement for InstallShield functionality?

I know that Apache projects like to release source code distributions but some projects also like to include binary (pre-built) distributions as well. In pre-Apache versions of UIMA, for instance, we used Installshield to create one-click (well, maybe 3-click) installers for Windows and Linux

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi, I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the 0.9.6-incubating release until we get it right. It would only be confusing if we actually publish the incubating release and then publish another 0.9.6. But iterations on the release candidate aren't new

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Sorry, I just don't like that changes to the bits based on an internal review should change the name of the release. Craig On Nov 21, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: To avoid those issue ActiveMQ tends to do a build of say ActiveMQ 4.1.0 and we drop it in a directory called

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

I don't think so. Let the podling come up with what they call 0.9.6, let it give clear information to what that means, and the incubator PMC votes from there. This is getting counterproductive. geir Patrick Linskey wrote: Hi, I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the

Re: missing announcement on announce mailing list

Hi, On 11/21/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sent a note to announce?apache.org a week ago to announce Tuscany's SDO Java M2 release. I have just got back the following message [...] but I don't know who the moderators are. Can someone help please? I'm now one of them. You

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

+1 from me. On 11/20/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/20/06, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 14, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: At this time you have, or will have, the required number of votes. We just need to see the Board resolution.

RE: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

We're doing something pretty much the same; just not calling it RC-anything. What do you do when it comes time to vote? Clearly, you can't be voting on the RC build, as that's not the final build (the final build doesn't include RC in the name, does it?), and it's my understanding that only final

Extracting code from an incubation project

All, The Abdera project currently contains a bit of code that implements the IRI (RFC3987) specification in a way that could be easily extracted out into its own project. Recently I posed a question to the Jakarta Commons and WS Commons projects to see if there would be interest in pulling that

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Hi Upayavira, On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Upayavira wrote: Patrick Linskey wrote: ...snipped... However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do. Is this going to cause problems with incubator approval of the 0.9.6 vote that's currently running on the OpenJPA mailing list? In the

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: For the purposes of closure, I am officially withdrawing this vote for the openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release while we make the changes that Robert mentions. We expect that a new vote will be started for the 0.9.6-incubating release Remember version numbers are

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1

Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah. maybe. Anyway, it will be difficult to fix until the maven guys take a look at the bug. I've raised a JIRA for that: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-180 What you probably could do in the meantime is to stick the license comment inside of the project

Re: [VOTE WITHDRAWN] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

William Good point, but since the trunk (from which 0.9.7-incubating- SNAPSHOT nighties are being built) has advanced with potentially destabilizing changes since the branch point 0.9.6-incubating, it might be even more confusing for anyone who is relying on 0.9.7- incubating-SNAPSHOT

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1

Since these are generated files, must they have license headers? We had a recent discussion on this on the legal-discuss list. To quote Roy: [1] We don't require headers on generated files because they are a pain in the butt to generate. Headers are not required to preserve copyright, so

[VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/ Maven Repository:

Re: missing announcement on announce mailing list

On 11/21/06, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 11/21/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: probably short of moderators. any member can volunteer to be added. I'd like to volunteer. Where do I sign up? cool :-) general infrastructure list - robert

RE: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

My feedback (YMMV): to be known as the The Apache Open For Business Project (also known as Apache OFBiz) I suppose that the Board can make a determination, but I think that Apache OFBiz is OK, whereas The Apache Open For Business Project might be confusing, e.g., would that be confused with

missing announcement on announce mailing list

I sent a note to announce?apache.org a week ago to announce Tuscany's SDO Java M2 release. I have just got back the following message Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. I'm sorry, the list moderators for the announce list have failed to act on

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-51) Digest mailing list (un)subscribe link don't work

Digest mailing list (un)subscribe link don't work - Key: INCUBATOR-51 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-51 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Bernd

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

and here is my enthusiastic ... +1 Dan Diephouse wrote: The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and published builds here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/http://people.apache.org/%7Eblin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/ Maven Repository: