Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> My feeling is that the Incubator PMC needs to clarify our diversity
> requirements, so waiting a bit is probably a good thing.
"Our" being whom? The ASF as a whole is what I hope the answer is, since
otherwise it would be some artificial Incubation requirement, and
Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort
> > on bringing in independent committers?
> Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging
> new committers and that this is having results.
Where? It seems to me that if it were havi
nt elder wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
itself, resolved licensing issues an
On 10/20/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on the
> tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the
> general@ list
BTW, that message says
> ...given the muddied waters how about waiting a lit
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please don't use [RESULT] in a thread that is still on-going. There may
> have been a result in the Tuscany PPMC, but there is no result yet from
> the
> Incubator PMC.
This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on
