+1 (non binding)
Gilles
2007/11/22, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
[ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to
On Nov 22, 2007 2:03 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up their own infrastructure
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
On Nov 22, 2007 3:03 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
-0
I think it's valuable to document who
Hi,
+1 to decentralizing where possible. Keep in mind Robert and RAT are
a fairly unique podling situation, so this policy change is largely
theoretical, I don't think it will affect many people in practice.
Yoav
On Nov 22, 2007 6:51 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 22,
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that infrastructure
approval should probably rest with the IPMC in general rather than the
mentors
Hi there,
I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
information and pointer to start from.
ThnksRgds,
Kaushik
Forgot the famous last words? Access your message archive online at
Hi Robert,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 5:54 PM, kaushik sarkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
information and pointer to start from.
On Nov 22, 2007 5:54 PM, kaushik sarkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
hi
I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
information and pointer to start from.
apache organises itself
On Nov 20, 2007 9:14 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we
implement that?
I would say that this depends on the judgment of the mentors, and it
is probably more important to evaluate the role they would be playing
Ask people to self nominate - I imagine often inactive commiters won't
put themselves forward, removing any issue. Then maybe a review of the
list by the the mentors and proposed PMC Chair. If there are issues it
can be discussed in the community and if theres disagreement then
vote. I
Btw would people have interest in a small script that would analyze a
given
project history and give stats on commits and who committed? I've built
something similar for infra [1] and such reports could be useful to the
IPMC
when a podling starts talking about graduation. I'm not sure how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell resolved INCUBATOR-71.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Allow podling committers with sufficient karma to set up their
On Nov 22, 2007 8:09 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Or re-elect all committers before graduation?...
...Ask people to self nominate...
Good idea, that's probably the easiest way of addressing that concern.
-Bertrand
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that
infrastructure
approval should probably rest
14 matches
Mail list logo
