The poor UIMA guys have been trying to get this release approved for nearly
two weeks now and it still has just a single vote. Could a couple of other
IPMCers take a look and vote?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC -
Thank
I'll review the release. However, I would like to see the mentors +1's
on this vote as well. The fact is that the incubator is a wide group
with disparate interests and it is incumbent on the mentors to be the
primary contacts for any podling.
Paul
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:31 AM, ant elder
Right, for those it makes sense to me...
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
For what it's worth, I agree with you, especially for projects entering
incubator.
The IP clearance template isn't generally applicable to projects entering
the Incubator. It is for processing code grants to existing
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
decisions that the Incubator is not responsible for making.
The required IP clearance questions should be:
Date:
Identify the
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:46, Paul Fremantle wrote:
the mentors to be the
primary contacts for any podling.
+1. With 3 active mentors, you practically need no other PMC members to wake
up (let me sleep ;o) ). If you don't have 3 active mentors, then that IS a
problem of concern, and should
