Understood. Taking a bit out of the email:
Such a dependency might be made somewhat invisible by transitive
dependencies on incubating projects, but the problem is exactly the
same if a non-incubating project depends on GPL stuff transitively.
That's a Maven problem, not an incubator problem.
Bertrand,
Facts:
- We have 11 failures so far in the incubator
(http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html)
- We have had G PMC pick up the code from a failed incubation (Yoko)
- We have disclaimers all over the place
(http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html)
Any PMC that ships
Hi Dims,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Any PMC that ships incubator developed code is responsible for what
happens when a community does not form around the code base used. Any
one outside Apache that ships incubator code should be totally aware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok. Next we get rid of disclaimers everywhere? What purpose does that serve?
- -- dims
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
| Hi Dims,
|
| On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| ...Any PMC that ships incubator
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Ok. Next we get rid of disclaimers everywhere? What purpose does that
serve?...
I don't see why we would get rid of disclaimers.
-Bertrand
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
| Hi Dims,
|
| On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:25
if one set of users never see them, why should everyone else?
-- dims
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Ok. Next we get rid of disclaimers everywhere? What purpose does that
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
So can we figure out another way to make the end user make a conscious
decision?
I doubt we will get much help from the maven team to support this use
case. They would rather get the central repo and get it done! What
bugs me is that in this whole discussion, no one
On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Apache isn't about 'community over code'. The code is just as
important - if not more so. For Incubator releases, the releases
aren't held to the same legal standard as releases from
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 7, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Apache isn't about 'community over code'. The code is just as
important - if not more so. For Incubator releases, the releases
aren't held to the same legal
2008-July JSPWiki Incubator status report
JSPWiki has been incubating since September 2007.
JSPWiki is a JSP-based wiki program.
During the past three months, the JSPWiki community seems to still enjoy
a steady increase. The developer list now has 59 names, an increase
of 15%. The user list
2008-July Sanselan Incubator status report
Sanselan has been in incubation since September 2007.
Sanselan is a pure-java image library for reading and writing
a variety of image formats.
The community hasn't grown much in the past three months. There
continues to be only one active committer.
2008-July JSecurity Incubator status report
JSecurity is a powerful and flexible open-source Java security framework
that cleanly handles authentication, authorization, enterprise session
management and cryptography.
JSecurity has been incubating since June 2008.
The project has kicked off
2008-July Imperius Incubator status report
Imperius has been incubating since November 2007.
Imperius is a rule-based infrastructure management tool
Code: Made several enhancements to the code:
1. Added cascaded policy evaluation capability for Java-SPL.
This allows one policy to invoke
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
For Incubator releases, the releases aren't held to the same legal
standard
as releases from other PMCs.
Huh? The only difference I know of is the possible presence
of external dependencies on LGPL code, which is not a legal
question at
14 matches
Mail list logo
