William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This looks like a very interesting technology, and when proposed as a
collaboration by actual persons A, B, and C (who happen to work for
X, Y, and Z) we will have something to discuss.
Great, because that's what I think we have. It so happens that persons
D, E and
On 23-Jul-08, at 6:12 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I really don't see what the problem is here, there are two named
committers in the proposal. Whatever the interests of the companies
they work for, Tashi will have to create a healthy community to
graduate and I don't think corporate backing shou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tashi
Hi,
I've read the messages from Henning and William, and I'd like to address some
of the concerns voiced by them. I'm Michael Stroucken, and I'm a senior systems
programmer at CMU. That means I am staff, and my interests in the Tashi project
are
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't see what the problem is here, there are two named
> committers in the proposal. Whatever the interests of the companies
> they work for, Tashi will have to create a healthy community to
> graduate and I don
On Thursday 24 July 2008 05:23, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> In other words, I'll vote -1 on any Proposal for non-person entities
> X, Y, and Z to form an incubator podling, and I know several other PMC
> members who will do likewise.
I disagree. IMHO, wording in the proposal is irrelevant. If th
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>> There's no conspiracy here to steal Apacheness. Rather, Yahoo!, Intel and
>> CMU would like to collaborate on open source software. Intel and CMU have a
>> prototype, and Yahoo! is intere
Doug Cutting wrote:
There's no conspiracy here to steal Apacheness. Rather, Yahoo!, Intel
and CMU would like to collaborate on open source software. Intel and
CMU have a prototype, and Yahoo! is interested in helping to develop
this further. All three believe that other parties will also b
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
- Are the proposed committers, people "assigned to work on the project"
or are they genuinely interested in this software.
Those are not necessarily disjoint sets. Folks who are "assigned" are
frequently also "genuinely interested", and vice versa.
IAW, will
Hi,
a number of questions:
- Are the proposed committers, people "assigned to work on the project"
or are they genuinely interested in this software.
IAW, will they stick around or leave as soon as they are reassigned to
other projects or their grants run out?
The wording for the Yahoo! "slot"
No worries. I've removed the entry on the wiki version of the proposal
at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal. It now reads
simply:
Initially, there will be one committer each from Carnegie Mellon and
Intel Research:
* Michael Stroucken ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Michael Ryan ([EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks ok to me so +1.
> >
> > Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
> > myself and it didn't highlight any issues.
>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:18 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks ok to me so +1.
>
> Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
> myself and it didn't highlight any issues.
>
> If the doc pdf is going to be distributed separately it should probably
> includ
12 matches
Mail list logo
