On Mon 17 Aug 2009 10:20, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, David Crossleycross...@apache.org wrote:
The NOTICE file is not for that purpose. Did you mean to
say that you have seen LICENSE files containing pointers?
No, I don't mean LICENSE... IIRC
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: David Crossley cross...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 11:10:13 PM
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: Thrift release legal issues
Joe, as far as i
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:38 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon 17 Aug 2009 10:20, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, David Crossleycross...@apache.org wrote:
The NOTICE file is not for that purpose. Did you mean to
say that you have seen
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every third party
library MUST have a license but including them next to
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
AIUI this is only best practice, not normative. every
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/08/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-beta1. We would now like to request
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
You can put all the licenses or references to the licences in the
LICENSE file.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Given whats being said in the Thrift release
legal issues thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 8/12/09 5:44, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
PS. Why we're inventing new terms? We've been using retire for
years, and it's consistently
On 17/08/2009, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Given whats being said in
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me too.
AIUI, the NOTICE file needs to give attributions to all 3rd party code
included in the propose release.
no - just require 3rd party attribution notices and relocated
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Evanseev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the Thrift release
legal issues thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Robert Burrell
Donkinrobertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 17/08/2009, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L
Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
the NOTICE file looks acceptable to me
Hi Eric,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
Given whats being said in the Thrift release
legal issues thread i think it should be ok to have the 3rd party
licenses separate,
I disagree. It must be possible to find all the LICENSE
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Craig L Russellcraig.russ...@sun.com
wrote:
Hi Ant,
On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at
19 matches
Mail list logo
