Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: 2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: ... +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the time... Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we have two experienced ASF members as mentors, but

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
2009/9/10 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: 2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: ... +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the time... Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
2009/9/9 Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Kevan Millerkevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let Jeremy update the Wiki. Since we're at it, I'd like to sign up as a committer as well (apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
2009/9/8 Peter Peshev ppes...@gmail.com: Hi Jeremy, Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new OSGi project focused on Java EE sounds quite interesting. Btw, when looking at the proposal I would  personally suggest even to expand the scope and include other Java

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Hi Peter, 2009/9/9 Peter Peshev ppes...@gmail.com: Hi Jeremy, We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the proposed Aries project. What's the process - should I just add the six names on the wiki ? Maybe we could discuss this offline to not spam the whole mailing list.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Roman Roelofsen
Hi, ProSyst would like to support the Aries project. 2 people could join the Aries development, Todor Boev (t.b...@prosyst.bg) and myself, Roman Roelofsen (r.roelof...@prosyst.com). We will check the mentioned documents. Is there anything else we can do? Cheers, Roman

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tim Williamswilliam...@gmail.com wrote: I have a need for something like this coming up and have been passively looking at PhotArk.  I'd suggest that a project like this would do itself good by having a simple architecture diagram[1], some good screenshots[2],

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: 2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: ... +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the time... Can I persuade you to sign up :-)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Sure, please go ahead and add yourselves to the proposal wiki page. Jeremy 2009/9/10 Roman Roelofsen r.roelof...@prosyst.com: Hi, ProSyst would like to support the Aries project. 2 people could join the Aries development, Todor Boev (t.b...@prosyst.bg) and myself, Roman Roelofsen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Peter Peshev
Hi Jeremy, Thanks , we would need a few more days to finalize all the participants from our side, some people are on vacation this week . Maybe it could be even a bigger number. Is there a deadline ? Best Regards Peter On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Peter Peshev
Hi Jeremy, Well, I had some other use cases in mind besides Message driven Blueprint components At least in my view JMS API is quite popular and stable so it's not a rare case to be used from web applications as it is. An interesting use case would be the resource provisioning. I would expect

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

2009-09-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote: +1 (non-binding unfortunately). Any IPMC members willing to have a look at this release? Did the Empire-db mentors vote on this release already? I don't see any mentor's +1s here, was there a vote on the project's list?

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
2009/9/10 Peter Peshev ppes...@gmail.com: Hi Jeremy, Thanks , we would need a few more days to finalize all the participants from our side, some people are on vacation this week . Maybe it could be even a bigger number. Wow, sounds like you have a lot to contribute :-)  Is there a deadline

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Sorry, I didn't mean we would exclude applications from using the JMS API. There are cases where a Blueprint component isn't concerned what async comms is being used, and there are times when that level of detail is needed. There are many use cases which of course we haven't thought about and that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-10 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Kevan Millerkevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let Jeremy update the Wiki. Since we're at it, I'd like to sign up as a committer as well (apache username ngn). Will be quite