Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Hi, sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial committer list as well :) Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

I've added both Jean-Sebastien and you to the proposal. 2009/9/11 Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org: Hi, sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial committer list as well :) Thanks Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Hi Jeremy, No I don't feel strongly for this, I am not suggesting a change of the proposal, I am just trying to build a detailed picture for myself (and perhaps for the community) what exactly some parts of Aries project would look like. I am not Apache experienced, so I am not sure whether I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Hi Jeremy, Yes, I would try to do that on Monday morning Best Regards Peter On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week (15 Sept) to call a vote. Peter, does that give you time to supply your

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

I'm also interested in the Aries project and would like to sign up as an initial committer, especially in the area of distributed OSGi. I have been the key contributor in Apache Tuscany project to enable the runtime with OSGi and implement the OSGi remote services (originally RFC 119) using SCA

[CANCELLED] ([VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc1)

This vote is being cancelled because it was lapped by the next proposed release candidate, (and because no one would vote for it). On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:40 -0500, Eric Evans wrote: The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release candidate.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our previous attempt failed on

[VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

Peter Peshev wrote: Anyway - after reading the proposal , my mental model for Aries is the following - a group of bundles or web archives (here comes RFC 66 ) are grouped via a new extended SCA component type ( implementation.osgi_application) or perhaps inherit from the implementation.jee

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

 Distribution files are located here  http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal. They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files and

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

Hi Sebb, thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your verdict. However I have problems to reproduce your findings. I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The only difference I could find, was that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

Hi Rainer, The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content of the files do match. could you tell me which ones those are? Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:  [X] -1  Distribution archives are broken. Maven artifacts don't have correct NL files. That war contains jar's that each

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

Francis De Brabandere wrote: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) Hi Rainer, The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content of the files do match. could you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: Distribution files are located here http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents. I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote: Hi Sebb, thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your verdict. However I have problems to reproduce your findings. I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote: [X] -1 Distribution archives are broken.