On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't
think weeding out those who consume more than they contribute as
an organizing principle would work. It is certainly not the way we
have been operating up to now at the ASF.
Yes it is. consuming in this
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not quite the scenario. We have a *dormant* component
(validator) in Commons and a couple of ASF committers (not commons
committers) have shown up proposing to re-write that component to
implement the
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 11:29 -0600, Eric Evans wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent,
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 1:54:18 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Phil Steitz
On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
As I said, we do not have a hard and fast rule on length of time,
but this nebulous notion is what makes the ASF work.
If that were true the incubator would need to be completely reworked,
because the process we use here is basically a
- Original Message
From: Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 9:27:26 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
As I said, we
On Dec 31, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Getting back to the subject, my primary objection to what's being proposed is
that
commons should handle this as an ip clearance, not as a project incubation.
If
commons insists that the individuals in question have to submit patches to
