Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 a big one of course! I communicated with agimatec-validator guys a few times and they needed at longest 4 hours to respond to my questions and apply my patches :) This project will be a great add to Apacheland! LieGrue, strub --- Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org schrieb am Mi,

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread James Carman
We already have Apache Commons Validator. Why not just bring this code into that project? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons Validation. On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote: On

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:18 AM, James Carman wrote: We already have Apache Commons Validator. Why not just bring this code into that project? Heh. That's been pretty well discussed, already, by both Commons and Incubator. You can scan the logs for details. The subject was [PROPOSAL] Validation

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Kevan Miller
+1 --kevan On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote. I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Incubator

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread James Carman
Sorry, didn't read the proposal very closely. The idea was that it would be brought into Commons Validator and become the 2.x codebase. I like that idea and I would think it would be wise to go through the incubator to make sure the codebase is donated cleanly to the ASF. My point was mainly

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 to accept Validation into the Incubator afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up however I for sure want to see this at Apache. If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !! We have 3 mentors. If you're

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, James Carman wrote: Sorry, didn't read the proposal very closely. The idea was that it would be brought into Commons Validator and become the 2.x codebase. I like that idea and I would think it would be wise to go through the incubator to make sure the codebase

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. That's how I view it. It's more than code clearance, however. There are processes for that, already. Community building is why it is starting off as an Incubator project. I think graduating to become Commons

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote. I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation

2010-02-24 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ... Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the same problem. BeanValidation might be ideal, and scans better than, say