Looks ok to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> I should have mentioned this,
>
> Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from:
>
> Davanum Srinivas
> Kevan Miller
>
> Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass.
>
> Thanks.
On 12/05/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
>
> > Sebb,
> >
> > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
> > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
> > confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # commen
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
> the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
> confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
> wink-common/src/main
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:34 +0530, Chintana Wilamuna wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:11 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> As Sanjiva mentioned we've been involved with a similar kind of effort
> as well. May be we can consolidate our efforts. I would also like to
> contribute to this
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:42 +0530, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> I would like to contribute. Please add me as an initial committer.
> (shankar AT apache DOT org) .
Welcome. Added you to the proposal.
David
-
To unsubscri
On May 11, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
> the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
> confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
> wink-common/src/main/
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
wink-common/src/main/
resources/META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDe
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> Thanks Sebb for your review,
>
> I'll try to address each of your concerns:
>
> 1) AL headers are missing from...
>
> These files list implementation classes like other standard
> META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write c
Thanks Sebb for your review,
I'll try to address each of your concerns:
1) AL headers are missing from...
These files list implementation classes like other standard
META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write code
that reads these files in the next release but I don'
Just tried building the source archive using mvn install.
This reports a lot of warnings from the license:check goal.
Seems unnecessary to include a license check in every build; it should
probably be run as part of the site generation - if it is run
automatically at all.
Also, I got a test error
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
>> We've added
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
>> We've added
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's second milestone
release (PhotArk M2-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
to publish the release.
Please review and vote on approving the M2-incubating release
artifacts of PhotArk.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://p
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> IPMCers,
>
> Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
> I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the
> process indicated here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-
I should have mentioned this,
Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from:
Davanum Srinivas
Kevan Miller
Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass.
Thanks.
mike
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
> IPMCers,
>
> Wink 1.1 release voti
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the
process indicated here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
The Maven staging area is
Ok thanks I see them now.
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>> The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home
>>> pa
On 5/11/2010 7:14 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
"The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
>>
>> "The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
>> enabling an enterprise OSGi application prog
Title says all ;-)
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
