Big +1 to all Greg's comments below. Let's just try it - I don't see a huge
effort/loss ratio - I think we'd all be surprised at how well folks are at
responding to requests if we just ask them to.
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/11/10 10:15 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message
From: Brett Porter br...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 2:31:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] NPanday to enter the incubator
On 07/08/2010, at 1:21 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Ant,
My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals from ppmc's
who end up in ipmc would help build bridges between podlings and will help
get lessons learned (when any ppmc has
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-08-11, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The real point though is not size - its *activity*.
[absolutely correct observation of low activity snipped]
My
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
all the Incubator projects, but pretty
Hi Niall,
On 8/12/10 2:52 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
Clearly then there are small TLPs that operate effectively. However
any TLP that can't get 3 PMC votes is effectively dead and I don't
want to see RAT end up in that situation in a year or two. Seeing only
3 votes
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
for voting in new committers: basically
On 2010-08-12 02:31, Brett Porter wrote:
On 07/08/2010, at 1:21 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised the proposal with the additional committer and it has now
been posted for a couple of weeks, so I'd like to put it to a vote.
With the weekend included, I'll tally the votes
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 12:43:59 AM
Subject: Re: an experiment
There isn't anything that would stop a mentor from proposing a podling
committer who is not an ASF member as an IPMC
- Original Message
From: Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 1:13:41 AM
Subject: Re: an experiment
Yes, definitely more controversial. Pros would include greater
exposure to the Incubator noise, learning from others,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised the proposal with the additional committer and it has now
been posted for a couple of weeks, so I'd like to put it to a vote.
With the weekend included, I'll tally the votes after 5 days (120 hours).
On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
for voting in new committers: basically rolling back the clock
to
- Original Message
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 2:21:44 PM
Subject: Re: an experiment
On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
+1
Craig
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised the proposal with the additional committer and it
has now been posted for a couple of weeks, so I'd like to put it to
a vote.
With the weekend included, I'll tally the votes after 5 days (120
hours).
Craig,
in my mind, it's not the number of steps that we eliminate, it's the
message that we send. Instead of saying you all are *under* the
microscope, we say that real quickly a few of you will become part of
the microscope and look in on not just yours but also other
podlings...my 2 cents.
Hi Dims,
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Craig,
in my mind, it's not the number of steps that we eliminate, it's the
message that we send. Instead of saying you all are *under* the
microscope, we say that real quickly a few of you will become part of
the microscope and
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
Craig
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised the proposal with the additional committer and it
has now been posted for a couple of weeks, so
Fair enough :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dims,
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Craig,
in my mind, it's not the number of steps that we eliminate, it's the
message that we send. Instead of
-Original Message-
From: cctriel...@apache.org [mailto:cctriel...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, 13 August 2010 6:05 AM
To: public-comm...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r984937 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-
publish/deltacloud/
Author: cctrieloff
Date: Thu Aug 12
19 matches
Mail list logo
