On 8/11/10 5:29 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:19:03 PM
Subject: Re: an experiment
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me
On 8/11/10 5:30 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
On 08/11/2010 05:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
and procedural approaches to the projects I
I'd be willing to help out with a RAT TLP. We're using it in our normal
build process for OpenJPA, Geronimo and Bean Validation, so helping out
on future votes is the least I can do.
-Donald
On 8/12/10 5:52 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
...The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
for voting in new committers:
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #2 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r985290):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.2-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
+1
Ran apache-rat:check on the source-release.zip and it passed.
Was able to build the source-release using Maven 2.2.1 and 1.6.0_20.
Stand-alone TCK tests passed.
In-container TCK tests passed.
Staged artifacts have PGP signatures and contain the required License,
Notice and Disclaimer files.
