+1
Carl.
On 08/18/2010 07:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks
On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
identifying the project with the ASF. Similarly on many occasions we have
asked projects to pick a new name as part of the incubation process. We have
made exceptions for well established brands (ServiceMix ActiveMQ were the
first I
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 14:03, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
wrote:
I don't care what you call them in the project. I'm asking that you use
Apache terminology when discussing things among the wider Apache
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from
IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer,
effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC.
Additionally
On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
+1
-Matt
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
I don't care what you call them in the project. I'm asking that you use
Apache terminology when discussing things among the wider Apache
community.
The report is consumed by the svn community, too. They reviewed it and
provided
+1 Good luck. Hope to see you adopted into Android!
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:29, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
...
No way would the Board (nor you) allow arbitrary terminology across
projects even if it is parentheticals (whatever that means).
As far as I'm concerned, the participants are Committers. There is no need
to
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:03, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
...
This seems really simple to me. If I move from Korea to the United States I'd
better start learning to speak English if I want to interact with the
population at large. If I just want to stay within my little
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:06, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The report is consumed by the svn community, too. They reviewed it and
provided feedback. It uses terms from the svn community.
...
No way would the
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
As I said in my other post, by using *both* sets of terms in the
report, the svn community also learns what the formal names are here
at the ASF. They can see the translation.
So yeah. I'm doing exactly what you're asking: educating the
- Original Message
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 2:38:48 PM
Subject: Re: Subversion full/partial committer (was: Re: an experiment)
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
As I said in my
Greg Stein wrote:
Actually, we don't use ACLs at all. We simply tell them only commit
in your designated area. We haven't ever had a problem with that
approach.
Even better. :-) Relies on human respect.
Even better: if the committer gets a +1 on a patch from somebody with
full access,
Joe Schaefer wrote:
I'm perfectly comfortable letting the board provide feedback to Greg
about its expectations for future Subversion reports, and see no need
for anyone else to insert their opinions on the subject in any more
than a limited and advisory basis.
I'm still trying to figure out
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:56, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Actually, we don't use ACLs at all. We simply tell them only commit
in your designated area. We haven't ever had a problem with that
approach.
Even better. :-) Relies on human respect.
Even better:
Hi Joe,
Please read my messages again. I'm not suggesting anything of the sort.
Craig
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Cmon Craig. Subversion is a 10-year old community. Making major
changes
in basic terminology isn't something that happens in a day.
Craig L Russell
So it allows them to seamlessly earn wider karma via RTC?
Correct.
So, it promotes CTR by the more experienced hands, and RTC by the less
experienced hands. That does not seem like a bad thing.
--- Noel
-
To
Craig L Russell wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:38:48 -0700:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
As I said in my other post, by using *both* sets of terms in the
report, the svn community also learns what the formal names are here
at the ASF. They can see the translation.
So
Hi all,
In all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift 0.3, we've
accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4!
I propose we accept
http://people.apache.org/~bryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc1.tar.gzhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.4.0-rc1.tar.gzas
the official Thrift 0.4.0
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:20, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
So it allows them to seamlessly earn wider karma via RTC?
Correct.
So, it promotes CTR by the more experienced hands, and RTC by the less
experienced hands. That does not seem like a bad thing.
Yup.
And to clarify:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe,
Didn't you just suggest that Greg summarily drop
his use of local terminology from his reports, and
don't you consider the Subversion report a community
document, and therefore of educational value for the
wider community, not just the pmc, in some sense?
- Original Message
From: Craig
- Original Message
From: Bryan Duxbury br...@rapleaf.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 4:51:00 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC1
On thrift-dev, we had 7 +1 votes, including 3 from active Thrift committers
(myself, Mark Slee, and David Reiss) and
+1
--kevan
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer
On thrift-dev, we had 7 +1 votes, including 3 from active Thrift
committers
(myself, Mark Slee, and David Reiss) and one from a mentor (Doug
Cutting).
The myself here refers to me, Bryan Duxbury.
I assume you're not asking me if I'm voting +1 on the release in the
general@ - I was under the
The vote is now closed and succeeded with 11 binding +1 votes, one
non-binding +1 vote and no negative or neutral votes.
Binding votes:
Chris A. Mattman
Craig Russell
Martijn Dashorst
Gavin McDonald
Emmanuel Lecharny
Kevan Miller
Joe Schaefer
J. Daniel Kulp
Alan Cabrera
Niall Pemberton
Noel
I wish we had completed this discussion while subversion was still in
incubation, while the subversion community could learn the common
Apache terminology and have no need for translation of the terms.
Instead, a suggestion to that effect was brutally shot down.
And since it's apparently
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
** Community
Since our last report, in May, we have added two more committers.
These are partial committers, meaning they are restricted to certain
portions of the tree. The first, artagnon, is a GSoC student for
Git(!) and is adding
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
I wish we had completed this discussion while subversion was still in
incubation, while the subversion community could learn the common Apache
terminology and have no need for translation of the terms.
Instead, a
Oh, I totally understand what you're saying.
And I respectfully and totally disagree with it on several levels.
We can leave it at that, or you can propose a Resolution to the Board
to enforce terminology whenever different communities want to
communicate here at Apache. Should the Board pass
- Original Message
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 6:45:54 PM
Subject: Re: Subversion full/partial committer (was: Re: an experiment)
I wish we had completed this discussion while subversion was still in
On Aug 19, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Hm, sounds like sour grapes reappearing. Having the subversion
community
drop 10 years of common terminology and quickly adopt ours isn't
what I
consider part and parcel of incubation.
I guess I have to say it again. I'm not suggesting
32 matches
Mail list logo
