On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
(...)
To keep things moving, I'd like to go ahead and put this proposal to a vote
starting on Tuesday on the west coast of the US (roughly 24 hours from now).
I want to get some information about an issue that, like the
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Santiago Gala santiago.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Dan Peterson dpeter...@google.com wrote:
(...)
To keep things moving, I'd like to go ahead and put this proposal to a vote
starting on Tuesday on the west coast of the US (roughly 24
I'd like to add to what Soren said: we've discussed whether we should include
the protocol and the
implementation of the protocol in the proposal. What we concluded, is that
having everything
together would be the simplest for the time being... although I don't think
anyone in the discussion
On 11/25/2010 07:35 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple review: the original email was sent by Dan Peterson from his
google.com address. I imagine that if Google had a problem with it,
then he wouldn't be working there tomorrow
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Ian Roughley rough...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/25/2010 07:35 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
So, I think there's an underlying issue here that hasn't been brought up yet.
And from the many
discussion with Dan, I think it's Google's fault :-)
I just want a leveled
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ian Roughley rough...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to add to what Soren said: we've discussed whether we should include
the protocol and the
implementation of the protocol in the proposal. What we concluded, is that
having everything
together would be the
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
If you really feel that there needs to be a clarification, it should probably
go as a patch to the Apache site (specifically,
http://www.apache.org/licenses/), where it
I made an edit to the incubator site. What do you think of it?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
If you really feel that there
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
The earlier discussion thread can be found at:
[X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
11 matches
Mail list logo
