Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
> > I don't understand why ManifoldCF needs this special "skin" processing > that then needs to live in your svn. > At Forrest, we advise not to create their own skin unless absolutely > necessary. We prefer to address any needs in the default skin. > > With a quick flick through the ManifoldCF sit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread David Crossley
Karl Wright wrote: > The RAT report after these changes looks good except for two files, > which come from the skins in the site: > > [rat:report] Unapproved licenses: > [rat:report] > [rat:report] > C:/wip/mcf-release/release-0.1-branch/site/src/documentation/skins/common/xslt/html/split.xsl >

[VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC2a)

2011-01-07 Thread Luciano Resende
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish the release. This release candidate has minimal changes compared to the previous release candidate and address the license/notice issues raised on this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
The community wanted to include both a source and a source+binary distribution. Accordingly, I spun up one of those, which is RC5. The RC4 candidate is still up there, so I guess you can vote on either one. Thanks! Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Karl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Karl, Great job. +1 from me. SIGS check out: [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating] mattmann% gpg --verify apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Fri Jan 7 02:44:17 2011 PST using RSA key ID 03824582 gpg: Good signature from "Karl David Wright (CODE SIGNI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Mark Struberg
oki that's fine then. Only did read 0.1 and didn't get the suffix. LieGrue, stru --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Karl Wright wrote: > From: Karl Wright > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:14 AM > The release is numbered

Re: Confusing naming of Manifold Connector Framework resources

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, sebb wrote: > On 6 January 2011 20:29, Karl Wright wrote: >> The official name of the project has changed repeatedly.  The current >> official name is "ManifoldCF".  The community expects to change both >> the SVN root and the web-site root upon incubation in any c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
I have uploaded a new artifact now. I could call this a release candidate except for the following: - This artifact has not been voted on by the ManifoldCF community. It is probably necessary to revote since what is included in the package has changed (e.g. no build artifacts except for docs). -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Florent Guillaume
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming Florent On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > The release is numbered 0.1-incubator right now.  I could not find any > rule that said what the actual format of the release number should be. >  Can you point me to th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Florent Guillaume
Actually 0.1-incubating or 0.1.0-incubating if I'm not mistaken. Florent On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the > Incubator rules. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
The release is numbered 0.1-incubator right now. I could not find any rule that said what the actual format of the release number should be. Can you point me to the document that describes this? Thanks, Karl On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > btw, the release number should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Mark Struberg
btw, the release number should not be 0.1 but incubation-0.1 according to the Incubator rules. LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Crossley wrote: > From: David Crossley > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Date: Friday, January 7, 2011

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread David Crossley
Karl Wright wrote: > The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If > there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be > willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added > step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

2011-01-07 Thread Karl Wright
The ManifoldCF documentation already requires Forrest 0.9-dev. If there was a downloadable binary version of 0.9-dev available, I'd be willing to consider requiring the user to install it. But that added step is just too much, I think, to expect people to do as part of an initial ManifoldCF setup