Same here, all the best to Lucene.Net incubation.
Cheers,
Tommaso
2011/1/13 Simon Willnauer
> +1 to this proposal - I am happy to see that this worked out and
> Lucene.Net moves forward!
>
> simon
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Gianugo Rabellino
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 P
+1 to this proposal - I am happy to see that this worked out and
Lucene.Net moves forward!
simon
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to
>>
Marc
Sounds like a really interesting proposal. I also slightly share Dan's
concerns about community, but while this is never going to have a
diversity of 10, it might easily have a diversity of 3 which is
enough. I do agree with Dan that we need to involve the WSS4J
community into this discussion
Marc,
I honestly think this would be a VERY hard project to incubate and I'd like to
suggest an alternative course of action..
Basically, this is an extremely targetted technology, and not exactly a "fun"
one at that. I'm willing to bet I can count the number of people in the
world that
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to
> the Incubator.
I am happy to support this proposal and signed up as a mentor.
--
Gianugo Rabellino - gianugo at rabellino dot it
Blog: http://boldlyopen.com
---
All,
Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to
the Incubator.
Lucene.Net is currently a Lucene sub-project, however, for reasons
detailed in the proposal and various mailing list discussions, we have
decided that a move back to the Incubator, with the intent of future
g
+1
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> +1 from me (binding)
>
> -- dims
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> > Poke to general@ people, we need more IPMC votes for this release to
> happen :(
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Jerry Chen wrot
+1 from me (binding)
-- dims
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Poke to general@ people, we need more IPMC votes for this release to happen :(
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Jerry Chen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With 6x +1 votes (including 2 binding), and no -1 votes, th
Poke to general@ people, we need more IPMC votes for this release to happen :(
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Jerry Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 6x +1 votes (including 2 binding), and no -1 votes, the vote seeks the
> approval of the IPMC.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
> On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:10 AM
Dear Incubator PMC members,
on behalf of the Chemistry dev team, I'd like to ask your approval to
release the RC1 packages as Chemistry OpenCMIS 0.2.0-incubating.
The release has passed the Chemistry PMC vote: http://bit.ly/i0qwI0
During the vote, also 1 IPMC (Jukka Zitting) vote has been coll
I spotted that report reminders had not gone out (Minotaur was down at
the point when the cron task should have triggered), so I ran it
manually.
I have already removed Thrift from the reporting schedule, but it'll
take Clutch a little while to notice (the reminders derive their info
from Clutch).
Dear Thrift Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
Due to a technical issue at the beginning of this month, incubator report
reminders were not sent out.
This is to remind you that you need to prepare a board report, which needs to
be subm
12 matches
Mail list logo
